Pedigree designation strangeness

[DKB]

I find it odd the ASM 300 Don Rosa on eBay right now has the "Don Rosa Collection" pedigree notation while Doug's Copper Winnipegs (like all the Uncanny books on his site right now) do not. I had thought there a hard and fast rule for what year books would get the label notation, but I guess not eh?

[VintageComics]

The Don Rosa books are not considered a pedigree as much as a collection...don't know what the scoop is with the Winnipegs....great place to buy comics from though

[DKB]

I think we covere the whole "Don Rosa, pedigree or collection?" in a thread before and it was determined it was a true pedigree. (And that there was much more of it to come from well before the bronze age) It easy to get confused considering it has collection in the title, but is listed on the slab in the pedigree location.

 

http://boards.collectors-society.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=comicgen&Number=933083

[arexcrooke]

The Don Rosa books are not considered a pedigree as much as a collection...don't know what the scoop is with the Winnipegs....great place to buy comics from though

Winnipegs are great books! Ive got a ToS 90 and am looking at some Nick Fury's as well

[joe_collector]

I find it odd the ASM 300 Don Rosa on eBay right now has the "Don Rosa Collection" pedigree notation while Doug's Copper Winnipegs (like all the Uncanny books on his site right now) do not.

 

Yeah that's screwed up, as neither does the Pacific Coast ASM 300, and wasn't there a bit of hoopla about that where CGC stated it "would not give a book Pedigree status until it was at least 30 years old"?

 

If the Don Rosa Collection is a Pedigree, and CGC has stated it is, then it needs to adhere to the same rules.