Green label pristine 10's in the newest grading system 1 1

[Leiataua Dr. Jon]

On 7/6/2023 at 4:02 PM, CGCRyan said:

I appreciate your patience and apologize for the continued delay. As soon as I get a definitive answer, I will relay it to you.

Sounds good.  Next week is aok too.  Enjoy the weekend!

 

[CGCRyan]

On 7/7/2023 at 11:58 AM, Leiataua Dr. Jon said:

Sounds good.  Next week is aok too.  Enjoy the weekend!

 

I was told that you can submit the black/gold label CSG Gem Mint 10 cards for grade review under a regular grading tier. You would select the grading tier on the online submission form and submit those cards like a regular submission. Then you will need to include a note on the packing slip that you are requesting a grade review for the CSG Gem Mint 10 encapsulated cards for a possible cross as a CGC Cards Pristine 10 gold label. Also, affix a note to the CSG Gem Mint 10 encapsulated cards with a similar note requesting the grade review for a possible CGC Cards Pristine 10 grade. Putting a note on the packing slip as well as on the cards themselves, will ensure that the grade review is performed on those cards. The cards sent for grade review will be charged the applicable grading fees according to the grading tier you submitted them under.

[northkorea]

I still say that CSG should consider the following:

Any black 10 or green 9.5+ should be eligible for a one-time $5 reconsideration fee. If the card would upgrade to a Pristine 3.0, then the submitter would be charged an additional $5 (or $7) to have the card placed in a Pristine 3.0 holder. If the card fails to upgrade, the submitter could still opt to pay the reholder fee.

This seems an equitable solution, as some 10s clearly aren’t pristine.

[Leiataua Dr. Jon]

On 7/8/2023 at 3:17 PM, northkorea said:

I still say that CSG should consider the following:

Any black 10 or green 9.5+ should be eligible for a one-time $5 reconsideration fee. If the card would upgrade to a Pristine 3.0, then the submitter would be charged an additional $5 (or $7) to have the card placed in a Pristine 3.0 holder. If the card fails to upgrade, the submitter could still opt to pay the reholder fee.

This seems an equitable solution, as some 10s clearly aren’t pristine.

That sounds like a great idea!  Ryan: is that something CSG would consider?

 

[northkorea]

On 7/9/2023 at 2:52 AM, Leiataua Dr. Jon said:

That sounds like a great idea!  Ryan: is that something CSG would consider?

 

I doubt it. After all, they can currently charge $12 and have the same outcome.  It just seemed equitable in my head.