BLACK GOLIATH #1 CGC 9.6, WHITE PAGES, FOR SALE!!

[metropoliscomics]

Who's the MAN! That's right, Black Goliath. Here is the first issue, "Because you demanded it!" An awesome copy with perfect white pages. This issue re-tells the character's origin and features art by George Tuska and Vince Colletta. Black Goliath #1, he's a Man's Man, baby. If this book is not what you are looking for, feel free to let me know what kinds of books you would like to see me put up here and if there is something specific you are looking for. If you are interested in this book or have a question, please feel free to call toll-free at 1(800) 229-6387 x10 or e-mail me at orders@metropoliscomics.com. To view large scans please see the URLs below. Thank You.

 

http://metropoliscomics.com/incoming/BLA34.25a.jpg

 

http://metropoliscomics.com/incoming/BLA34.25b.jpg

 

 

BLACK GOLIATH ----------------------------------------------------------

ISSUE GRADE PRICE

1 NM+ 9.6 $75.00

(CGC White pgs)

 

CGC: 097743019

 

Ed Sanchez

Metropolis Collectibles

[OldGuy]

Up $50 from your last sale?

 

http://boards.collectors-society.com/sho...e=2#Post1011669

 

Wow.

[Sal]

George Tuska & Vince Colletta!

 

 

 

 

i dare, dare you, i say to find a worse possible combination of two artists from the last fifty years.

 

 

that said, good luck with the auction, it's a sweet book, and if someone buys it, they'll never have to look at the abominable art inside

[B-Smooth]

wow...blacksploitation at its finest. Im sending in all my 9.0s to metropolis to be graded as 9.6s.

[BronzeBruce13]

Frank Robbins with anybody else… even Neal Adams

 

George Tuska & Vince Colletta!

 

i dare, dare you, i say to find a worse possible combination of two artists from the last fifty years.

 

 

that said, good luck with the auction, it's a sweet book, and if someone buys it, they'll never have to look at the abominable art inside

[Sal]

Frank Robbins with anybody else… even Neal Adams

 

George Tuska & Vince Colletta!

 

i dare, dare you, i say to find a worse possible combination of two artists from the last fifty years.

 

 

that said, good luck with the auction, it's a sweet book, and if someone buys it, they'll never have to look at the abominable art inside

 

well, that's a good start, but the "Colletta factor" destroys any advantage you may or may not have had with Mr. Robbins vs. Mr. Tuska. note that the Robbins/Colletta variant might be a winner, but you would have to find an example of this combination. i'd start with The Invaders, personally, but you're not exactly someone who needs this kind of information from me regarding same

[arexcrooke]

What the Juststopit.DoyouWANTastrike? is that in the Word circle to the right of the title? Is that something on the book or on the slab? If it is on the book then how did it get a 9.6?

[Timulty]

Could be the case has a nick but there ARE a few reflections coming off the slab itself. I would be more inclined to say, that is the "problem".

[metropoliscomics]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

[B-Smooth]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

 

You mean like the URFC?

[OldGuy]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

 

You mean like the URFC?

 

That corner is just "leaning" back, it's not missing or bent, just "relaxing".

[B-Smooth]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

 

You mean like the URFC?

 

That corner is just "leaning" back, it's not missing or bent, just "relaxing".

 

Can I borrw that one? Classic.

[OldGuy]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

 

You mean like the URFC?

 

That corner is just "leaning" back, it's not missing or bent, just "relaxing".

 

Can I borrw that one? Classic.

 

Run with it.

[B-Smooth]

I'm looking at the book and that is not even a nick or smudge on the case, it is a smudge from the scanner bed. The book would not have been graded a 9.6 if that were on the actual cover. A 9.6 should basically be free of any immediately obvious wear, you should have to look at the book closely to find the minimal amount of stress lines and/or light general wear allowable for a 9.6.

 

You mean like the URFC?

 

That corner is just "leaning" back, it's not missing or bent, just "relaxing".

 

Can I borrw that one? Classic.

 

Run with it.