My Thor 225 is Lonely

[joe_collector]

As it seems to be the trend of the day, here's one of my many copies that are waiting for CGC to lower rates on 1974 comics:

 

[nik]

Based on the front, a very strong NM/NM+

[joe_collector]

Based on the front, a very strong NM/NM+

 

The back is pretty standard fare, and my thought is 9.4 on a couple of them, this included.

 

You know it's weird, but I have a lot of these books and find them whenever I look through an old box - I must have been a real Firelord fanboy back in the day..

[B-Smooth]

9.4 maybe a 9.6

[divad]

9.4 / 9.6 if BC flawless

[KingOfRulers]

9.6

[kc120us]

very nice book. 9.4-9.6

[Timulty]

Grading Bastiche says.....Holy !!! A real 9.4, if the back is as good as the front, that is.

[arexcrooke]

I would much rather have this copy than mine due to the much better qp on yours. Very sweet book, 9.4 id say.

[the blob]

agreed, there's no real basis for the inexpensive (in guide) late 60s and 70s stuff to be more than post-76 and it's preventing a ton of submissions. if they want to charge more for all the square bounds and giant sizes from that era, that's another story. i guess more pages to count, charge more.

[inconceivable]

This one you may not want to wait on. It is possibly a top-census book (9.6 NM+) and by the time CGC lowers their rates it may not be the best. choices choices. I wish I had that choice to make!

 

Dan

[-cryptkeeper-]

9.6 really nice colors

[Jake01-migration]

9.6. Alot better than my copy