BA773 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Look at the difference of colour on the back of the Flash... the seller told me that it was not restored and was maybe a kid who have do it long time ago.. whats the difference with a restoration? I bet its ok if it was a "kid" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 If the intent behind the coloring was to hide a flaw then it's resto. Had the "kid" for example colored the yellow parts of Flash's suit red, that might be considered doodling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post shadroch Posted March 1 Popular Post Share Posted March 1 At least the ' kid" had the sense to do it on a DC. It's not as if he damaged a valuable SA comic. Gotham Kid, MasterChief, Engr62 and 6 others 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttock Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 On 3/1/2024 at 7:25 AM, BA773 said: Look at the difference of colour on the back of the Flash... the seller told me that it was not restored and was maybe a kid who have do it long time ago.. whats the difference with a restoration? I bet its ok if it was a "kid" Is it in a slab? Newton rings can look like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jas1vans Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Did the "kid" put red ink anywhere else on the book? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Zipper Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 100% restoration. Age of the person wielding the marker is not a factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
