Daredevil #138 CGC 9.6

[osborn_fr]

Please look at the top left (missing) corner of the back cover,

Is this allowed in 9.6 grade ?

 

[nik]

No way.

 

Someone dropped the ball on this copy.

 

Missing chips, small tears will keep a book out of the VF/NM range let alone a 9.6.

[osborn_fr]

I forgot to put the auction link.

[joe_collector]

Once again, if CGC rates it as a "production defect" it would have no problem on a 9.8 copy.

[Mr. Zipper]

Please look at the top left (missing) corner of the back cover,

Is this allowed in 9.6 grade ?

 

Obviously, it's allowed in **some** cases.

[THE_BEYONDER]

Once again, if CGC rates it as a "production defect" it would have no problem on a 9.8 copy.

 

They may not allow it for a 9.8, but 9.6 & below they do. I remember a book that had a small piece missing on the LRC of the back cover...and it came back 9.4

[joe_collector]

They may not allow it for a 9.8...

 

Have you seen some of Greggy's "nut-sack creased" CGC 9.8 copies? Much worse than this, and the official word was that production defects do not affect CGC 9.8 and below (with exceptions for really freaky stuff).

[B-Smooth]

Please look at the top left (missing) corner of the back cover,

Is this allowed in 9.6 grade ?

 

 

Production chip? Still, it shouldnt have been graded any higher than a 9.2.

[divad]

Please look at the top left (missing) corner of the back cover,

Is this allowed in 9.6 grade ?

 

Obviously, it's allowed in **some** cases.

 

Uh, maybe it's floating around in the case somewhere?

[-cryptkeeper-]

Please look at the top left (missing) corner of the back cover,

Is this allowed in 9.6 grade ?

 

Obviously, it's allowed in **some** cases.

 

Uh, maybe it's floating around in the case somewhere?

so everything is in the box then it's a 9.6

[jediknight]

Aside from the missing corner it looks like a steam roller passed over it. I'll bet that thing is flatter than a pancake.