• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

J.Sid

Member
  • Posts

    1,699
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by J.Sid

  1. I also don't think Miller did any indie work during this time either which means he must have gone out of his way to do the piece.

     

    He was actually working everywhere around this time period. DC, Marvel, Dark Horse, Image, Wizard, Valiant, Topps plus things like Convention Program contributions etc...

     

     

  2. Yeah, I get that of course, but still really odd to me. I've been around a number of "celebrities" over the years. Artists, writers, film industry types and just plain uber wealthy folks that never had or felt a need for a security guard, much less two.

     

    I get it with the A lister elite and the paparazzi psychosis that surrounds them. But Frank Miller? Comes as a bit of a shock to me, so what do I know. Good on 'em!

     

    He's made some polarizing political stands/statements in his time. Wouldn't be surprised if he'd received threats of some sort.*

     

     

    *just speculation!

  3. Not on Netflix, but if you can locate this one, it's a really interesting saga of one woman's battle against the collected powers-that-be who run the Jackson Pollock art market.

     

    Who the *spoon* is Jackson Pollock?

     

    Who the #$&% Is Jackson Pollock? is a documentary following a woman named Teri Horton, a 73-year-old former long-haul truck driver from California, who purchased a painting from a thrift shop for $5, only later to find out that it may be a Jackson Pollock painting; she had no clue at the time who Jackson Pollock was, hence the name of the film.

  4. Yes, he did several where we could see teeth.

    Including the 1975 painting "Oh, oh!"

     

    Only a bad reproduction has seen print of that painting, but very recently a slide of the painting turned up in Denmark. Here's a link where you can see it next to the Heritage piece and the old repro:

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3YW2KxMy-Uk/VhgGNyAWbWI/AAAAAAAAJJQ/Lk_iLEfia5k/s1600/Ska%25CC%2588rmavbild%2B2015-10-07%2Bkl.%2B20.00.40.png

     

     

     

     

    Here is a shot of the images overlaid onto the one another. I aligned the circles on top of each other so that you can see how drastic the differences are.

     

    Note the coins, feet, woman's leg, cane, shadow placement....

     

    overlay.jpg

  5. I see that the Uncle Scrooge painting has reached $5000 now.

    http://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/carl-barks-uncle-scrooge-painting-original-art-1974-/a/7152-92024.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515

     

    I have mailed Russ Cochran regarding the painting but have recieved no reply,

    and I have now sent Heritage two messages. Why?

    I have very strong doubts that it's by Carl Barks.

     

    Here's a comparisation between the Heritage painting (to the left) and a real Barks painting: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RyAQ-s9IKc0/VhgFiFZyCOI/AAAAAAAAJJA/usu5m_umUbo/s1600/Close%2Bup%2Bcompare.tif

    See how different the paint is applied.

     

    And just looking at a close-up noting the most striking things: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--fbunmfLURY/VhgFqUrFojI/AAAAAAAAJJI/_Ex-T3amTJI/s1600/Close%2Bup%2Bnotes.jpg

     

    They even claim it to be a lost 1974 painting. Well... That "lost" painting was re-discovered way back in 1992 and has since been published in Europe. It's called "The Tycoon". http://coa.inducks.org/story.php?c=CB+OIL++70-A

     

    What do you think?

     

    Interesting. If it were real, what price range would you expect it to sell for?