1986MoshPit

Hi, For this set in the registry UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Blue Auto there is one auto card that was never issued. As per the Trading Card Database (and known across the UFC collecting community) Auto card A-RH Roger Huerta, which is line item 31 in the Registry set does not exist, and it was replaced by Topps with a redemption auto card of A-RF Rich Franklin which is already on the registry set in slot 29. https://www.tcdb.com/Inserts.cfm/sid/57906/2009-Topps-UFC-Round-1 states the below: Insertion odds: Cards ABV, ACG, ACK, ACL, ADS, AEH, AGG, AHH, AKF, AKP, AMB, AMG, ARF*, ARH, ATA, ATS, ARCL: 1:15 packs; Cards ABS, AJB, AMR, ATC, AWG, ACBD, ASST: 1:20 packs; Cards AMS, : 1:70 packs; Cards ABB, AHD, ARG, ARL: 1:72 packs; Cards APK, AMDA: 1:94 packs; Cards AAS, AQJ, ARC, AGSP: 1:118 packs; Cards AFG, ABJP: 1:188 packs. *Card ARF is SN440 and was provided as the redemption for exchange card ARH (Robert Huerta) which was never issued. The stated odds are for the ARH exchange card. Although the A-RH Roger Huerta card is seen in some online checklists, the card was not ever issued. Does this make sense enough to remove the A-RH Roger Huerta card from the UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Blue Auto registry set ?

just popped box arrived !! woo hoo !!!!! Love it when a box shows up. It's fun ! My CSG 9.5 2009 Topps UFC round 1 # 91 Herb Dean card showed as 204 points before. Replaced it in the registry with a 10 just now, and the points went to zero. Actual '0' heh WOO HOO ! :)

Normally there is the greatness of the Front/Back card Image being auto added when I had a card to a registry set. Added 5 cards yesterday to a specific set and the images did not populate.

Too funny.. O/C cards are preferred in TCG land ? wow. That's like a mind freak.. rooting for O/C cards when busting stuff.

Done ! 102 Card set (1-99 and 3 checklists). Total composite for set # 1 - forty four 10s, fifty one 9.5s, and seven (to be revised one day) 9s. Gnarly ! Set #2 also done, a little less gnarly, but still gnarly

Boo Yah next batch arrived. I need one card here 9 or above to complete the set. .

love 'em. Agree that this is needed. The either 9 or 10 thing at the others does indeed make it a guess, or depends on if the grader is hung over and in a bad mood or not.

Don't lick the cards so much prior to sending them in for grading.

Ahhhh. Yes of course. Thank you 😀

HI, I entered in UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Top 10 Fight of 2008 Gold where the word Fight should be Fights (with the s on the end) . Is it possible to rename the set UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Top 10 Fights of 2008 Gold thank you

Next batch arrived Need two cards to complete the set above self submitted 9. Hoping for those along with more upgrades. Mosh.

Focus on just one or two sets, players, or teams. If you don't you'll be all over the place like I was for a couple decades and end up with a smorgasbord of goop that had no rhyme or reason. Once I got settled in on a couple different sets at a time, it all became clearer, and actually less stressful as it was just fine NOT going after a card I thought I had to have. Saved a heck of a lot of money NOT going psycho on anything/everything

ok next batch received Just need 6 in 9 or better to complete the base set. All other related subsets are outside of this base set effort. I know I'm typing to millions here ! (will be in a couple years with CSG ! ) Fully enjoying building (and spending stupid money) on this effort though. MOSH PIT FUN !

Most excellent Clemente 73 !

Hi, on a Sunday afternoon, if a code developer there has nothing to do .. heh heh would support ability to 'sort by grade' on a set would be beneficial to all. If that ability is there already and I'm missing it, excuse. Just makes it easier to see which cards should fall in the pursuit of upgrading. thank you.

Next batch received Nine cards left to complete in 9 or above.

Glorious ! thank you

Hi, this is due like one billion % on how we enter card descriptions for stuff not there already when completing the sub forms Inquiring on consolidating some stuff in the pop report. Example below, for 2009 Topps UFC, it is going to be either Round 1 or Round 2. It seems there are some cards listed just with '2009 Topps' or '2009 Topps UFC'. The 6 cards in the '2009 Topps' section here should be in the Round 1 pop report numbers. The 125 in the 2009 Topps UFC section is a mix of Round 1 and Round 2 along with various subsets. Would most likely get sorted over time by new set requests etc, but some fit in already existing sets.

Best Wishes Sarasota folks ! This looks brutal.

Ok, next batch has arrived Time to hopefully fill the empty slots and upgrade some.

Thanks Shockmaster.. I

My compliments to the coders of the registry set stuff. My set requests were added in and today I was able to easily start building one of the sets. The deal with it finding the existing certs for specific cards, allowing for just a click to add the card to the registry set, verse having to key in the cert number, was glorious. A lot of cards for the set were added this way which saved on the monotony of entering in cert after cert. There were two cards that fit the registry set where I got the 'card is not part of this set' response, so simply clicked on the provided 'inform us' button and will await the fix. coolness, thank you.

HI North Korea. Did you by chance do a lot of acid, like back in the hippy days ?

HI, could someone please check on this one. Something funky with the cert number and no grade message, when the card has a grade. Thank you

Alrighty, next batch arrived so time for beverages. Time to see one by one what I can add to or replace lower grade cards in the set build pursuit, while consuming beverages. Fun stuff. Especially with beverages. In fact, the only time I deal with cards, is when time available for beverages