Great article on Anderson, Scrooge! Thanks for posting this.
I have to disagree, however, with Foster's assertion that Anderson avoided the typical negative black stereotypes - all I see in the examples he has provided are the typical stereotypes of the period. While there are no witch doctors or cannibals, you have an "Aunt Jemima" type maid, a cook, "pickininny" children, a mahmout elephant driver, the "black minstral" ("the blak hed is musekal"), watermelon, etc.
I will agree, however, that Anderson's depictions of black people do not seem to be particularly mean-spirited - certainly not as mean-spirited as other works from the period. He also seems to be focusing on the similarities between the races, rather than the perceived differences - the fact that kids are kids regardless of their "color." In fact he seems to play with the concept of "racial role-reversal" in one strip where the black kids are being turned white and another in which Henry is turned black. Whether this was a conscious thing on Anderson's part is impossible to say, but it seems the message he is sending is that "race" is only skin-deep. This would certainly set him apart from many of his contemporaries and it is probably this distinction that has set him apart in Foster's mind.
Great food for thought! (thumbs u