ShaggyB

Yeah, phone support just said it could be up to 8 weeks from the signing date... so thats tomorrow.... plus adding thr days they got off i figure next two weeks so by the 18th for shipping.

Yeah i went with pressing, so im concerned something went wrong. No updates and it still hasnt created the link in the form yet

When did it say he signed?

Just shipped. Stayed 9.8.... wooooo

You the man. Good work

Another day.... xmen #1 lee/williams still in QC

Anyone know if the Ron Frenz signing has happened? @CGC Mikedo you know?

Bingo. If a grader touches it, it gets a new cert. If it gets a light level look where they go "yep, that case isnt tamperred with, we stand by our grade" it gets the new label and the same cert.

Yeah after 90 days its on them to provide as you get nothing

Not exactly, Matt said this "Not if you add a custom label. A re-holder that adds a custom label (which the ASM252 did) gets a new cert number. That’s what’s so weird here - it kept the same cert number." So hes thinking its not normal to get the same cert on a reholder with custom label, but it is possible and happens all the time. Its always a new number when a grader reviews it again... but if it doesnt get a grader, it keeps the same number. So the asm 252 that he thinks will always get the new cert brcause of custom label would be different from the book we are discussing here, as it has gone through a non standard process. Lol This thread is about the 252 that went through the normal process with the hole in it.

No not that one. Guy i responded to said 252 always gets a new cert number when adding custom label and asked why this didnt

Its likely the 252 they are speaking of got regraded due to some reason. Typically reholder does not involve recert. Thats the hole in the process we believe this guy(s) is/are exploiting

To add to this, my last 7 reholders all kept their cert numbers. One was a signature series black cat campbell signed virgin 601 homage cover. Had 2 venom lethal protectors, an asm 606 for nyc spidey label, 2 facsimile (asm 1 and asm annual 1) for the nyc spidey label and wolverine origins #1 for the wolvie label.... Just verified the submission forms with the relabel numbers and the what came back matches. My xmen #1 claremont sig had to go back with ME.. it kept its number too, allowed me to notice they missed my custom label and get money back for that. As far as ive seen, it only gets a new number if it goes through regrading.

I have had several reholder get the same number with special label

Still no movement on my xmen signature book

Regrade gets new number, reholder gets same number. Same with ME, same cert number.

Well, you can have multiple email accounts... so its not hard to have multiple ebay. Id say 1 for selling and 1 for buying makes sense for a non-scam reason.... but i have 1... so eh

Well said.

'The idea of Absolute Security is a myth. To think that it is possible is to invite in certain doom.' Its that simple. Nothing cgc does will ever be 100%, someone with time and desire will find a way. The trick is in how you handle it when it occurs. How fast do you respond, what changes do you identify and how quickly do you release info to your customer base / how do you make those impacted whole? They are at half a month now with it getting a bit worse every day with the exposure potential. The question is what do they do about it and when....

Happy new year Mike, thanks for chime'n in. If you do hear anything you can share, please do

Just a quick glance at the front... not seeing enough to warant 9.6 Slight corner on bottom left but thats mostly normal... so not sure if its something on the back causing it. Nice book though

Getting a bit tired of my book sitting in QC on a signing event that they are regrading it after the signing. Its not part of this reholder gate scandal... lets get them moving. Dont want to take time off from work to sign for it

Yeah first post you can see before and after on the yellow slabs. Thats all pressing

Went that route on superman #75 and pressing cause damage to the book. It now has visible spine stress and that does deserve the 9.6 rating

If you mean mechanical error. Its a selection in the normal grading a book section. However book sliding in case isnt one of the things they will fix from what i know. So they will likely charge you for the service. Edit https://www.cgccomics.com/news/article/11571/mechanical-errors-policy/ Thats the policy and loose book inside doesnt qualify