• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Ken Aldred

Member
  • Posts

    18,511
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Journal Comments posted by Ken Aldred

  1.  

    5 hours ago, Marwood & I said:

    Ahh.  Farting dogs and enclosed spaces rarely make good bedfellows in my experience.  I wonder how CGC would grade a book that was irrevocably impregnated with eau de dachshund? hm

     

    5 hours ago, Marwood & I said:

    I suspect unfavourably. 

    It's regarded as one of the worst defects imaginable, so horrific to contemplate that it doesn't really ever get discussed.  CGC have various tests, as you know ; black lights, trimming, colour touch, added pieces to covers, but when a submitted book has been exposed to this and tests positive, well, it really is the end, and time to put the comic out of its misery.

    It's little known that the only defect that CGC hammers the grade down on even more harshly than staining is canine flatulence.  A book with a 9.8 presentation that tests positive for exposure is lucky to be awarded a good, 2.0 label : completely unsaleable once the truth is known, even on Craigslist.

    It's generally considered better to keep such a book raw rather than suffer possible humiliation by getting it slabbed.