• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

RLL

Member
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RLL

  1. As someone who collected CGC graded comics well before getting into trading cards, I’m partial to that iconic blue label. CGC posted a mock-up showing the Purple Ghost-Spider 1/1 with the new label in their recent article, so I put it next the original blue label (with sub grades) to compare. I’m still convinced that Marvel cards look better with the blue. What do other Marvel collectors think?

     

    IMG_1832.jpeg

  2. A buddy of mine has been gathering a bunch of tcg cards for grading and was still deciding what service to use. I was a pretty strong advocate for CGC before the announced changes, but now I’m ambivalent about it. The things I liked most about CGC (sub grades, perfect 10, distinctive blue label) all vanished when they decided essentially to conform to CSG.

  3. Setting aside the label cosmetics for a moment, my impression is that the changes to the grading scale will benefit dealers and sellers more than collectors such as myself who primarily buy.

    A “gem mint” is a “gem mint” regardless if it’s labeled a “9.5” or a “10,” but psychologically the “10” designation will certainly be more attractive, and sellers will feel justified in charging higher prices. I have already witnessed the prices of some CGC 9.5 cards suddenly get marked up by 10%, 20%, or more since CGC announced that these will now be considered Gem Mint 10’s. I’ve also heard anecdotes from sellers claiming that they’ve recently sold tons more 9.5’s in anticipation of the upcoming change to 10’s. 

    Perhaps this is what CGC intended when it introduced the “market-friendly Gem Mint 10 scale.”  I imagine that dealers who submit hundreds or thousands of cards make up the bulk of CGC’s business, not individual collectors like me. If the dealers can sell their gem mint cards in higher volume and at higher prices by calling them “10” instead of “9.5,” then perhaps they will be more willing to choose CGC over the other grading companies. 

    Sure, perhaps my current 9.5’s could also fetch a higher price as 10’s if I ever decide to sell them. But in the meantime I’ll probably have to pay more for them to begin with. 

  4. Hi, I have a question on the current scoring. I have a CGC 9.5 card in the Spider-Man Metal Universe Grandiose set with 143 points. But other 9.5 cards get a score of 166. Is there a reason for the difference? Just trying to understand how the scoring works.  Thanks!

  5. On 4/4/2023 at 1:06 PM, jgood8g said:

    Why isn't this show on CGC's attending list?  Seems like a lot of celeb's signing and a large enough city for them to be there.  Fox, Lloyd, and Wilson aren't going to every fan expo city this year.

    It would be nice if CGC were attending.

    There will be some well known comic creators there: 

    https://fanexpohq.com/fanexpophiladelphia/comic-creators/

     

  6. On 3/7/2023 at 6:04 PM, xNikeSbx said:

    Got my books back in first signing super quick. Received 10/25 got them back 12/11. But i sent in cards before the books 10/6...and they have been SFG since 10/6. Anyone actually get signed cards back yet? I click submission and says an unexpected error has occurred. Makes more worried they're stuck in limbo or something. Called twice and they say same Todd just finished signing should move along soon. 

    My cards for signing just moved from SFG to GEI today.