• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Calamerica

Member
  • Posts

    10,789
  • Joined

Everything posted by Calamerica

  1. I like this post! He's a good bloke, even with his Batman fetish. Skynwalker is a true class act! CAL who has bought and sold from/and read Skyn's posts...
  2. Great finds, fellas! However, where I am at, such great finds are rare. Unsure why CAL can't figure this one out...
  3. See if you can get Dupont to man-up before the CAL haters PM him to stop to get all their gossip straight... CAL can man up too Sorry, I was busy trying to remember how to use the ignore function. Anyway, what I heard is this. A new member joined the forum. Just as it has happened many times in my experience, this person was immediately accused of being a shill. From what I hear you had a large role (maybe a solo role) in successfully convincing the mods this person was a shill, getting the account permanently deactivated. This person being a new member had no idea what had happened and called CGC to see why the account was banned. All was cleared up, the account was reinstated, and life continued on. Not registering at all. I wouild need to see the banned name, other circumstances, such as they were libeling me or calamerica-collectibles somehow, if what you say IS true, I will admit it immediately. But as of now, I really don't recall and can't recall without more specifics. CAL sticking to his ideas and guns You did this: http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3299024#Post3299024 Then got this: http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3299880#Post3299880 I am off to work so I will make this quick: Yes I did this Yes I thought Not*Sure was Stu because of her comments re: IMSM that Stu used to use BUT I SHOULD HAVE LET GO AT THE TIME I found out later she was who she is I did not know she was kicked of here and I will call Wednesday and inqure about that for myself We seem to get along now, or so I hope I was fond of her husband at one time, still am in the best way possible If she was kicked of because of me I will apologize on a sepearate thread Yes I have made many mistakes in life, and that day was one big one CAL who is sorry most for what CAL has done wrong, not others...
  4. See if you can get Dupont to man-up before the CAL haters PM him to stop to get all their gossip straight... CAL can man up too Sorry, I was busy trying to remember how to use the ignore function. Anyway, what I heard is this. A new member joined the forum. Just as it has happened many times in my experience, this person was immediately accused of being a shill. From what I hear you had a large role (maybe a solo role) in successfully convincing the mods this person was a shill, getting the account permanently deactivated. This person being a new member had no idea what had happened and called CGC to see why the account was banned. All was cleared up, the account was reinstated, and life continued on. Not registering at all. I wouild need to see the banned name, other circumstances, such as they were libeling me or calamerica-collectibles somehow, if what you say IS true, I will admit it immediately. But as of now, I really don't recall and can't recall without more specifics. CAL sticking to his ideas and guns
  5. See if you can get Dupont to man-up before the CAL haters PM him to stop... CAL can man up too Don't mix me in with Dupont or anyone else; their position differs from mine. I'm not against you; I'm trying to have a sane discussion with you. Please remove yourself from the cross when responding to me. COI who works alone. From COI You inferred to being in a "misleading argument". I am not mixing you w/ Dupont or anyone else. Was hoping to get a different response out of you but it did not happen If you work alone then why be here? I am now more confused CAL
  6. See if you can get Dupont to man-up before the CAL haters PM him to stop to get all their gossip straight... CAL can man up too
  7. Death threats are not characteristic of this community, so this community doesn't need any improvement on that basis. Ok, the authority has spoken. Let's shut this thread down and delete it. No need to discuss anything else moving forward. (said with tongue firmly in cheek). Just because they aren't posted in Comics General or made public on the forum doesn't mean other threats like this don't occur and occur more than you think. I was once threatened to be beat up here. I didn't say anything about it because I was brand new and quite honestly...didn't know what to do. I put the user on ignore and they turned out to be a shill anyway that disappeared quickly. Don't think it doesn't pop in my mind when i'm walking on a dark street sometimes. It's never fun to have a threat either in-person or written. It has a negative effect that could be paranoia or exagerated but nonetheless doesn't take away the anxiety associated with getting a threat like that. I can't wait to see what Dopont has heard... I tried to tell you all that the PMing gossip with false info gets around like wildfire here... i gotta go soon but I will be back I can't wait CAL gotta go real soon...
  8. What does this have to do with? I never had anyone banned that did not deserve it. I am not the forum police. I am just a wanna-be forum poilceman who trades funny books as a hobby. CAL still confused Not what I heard What did you hear? man-up or begone CAL
  9. Thanks CAL. I'm really not in anyone's camp,,,not CALs or F_T or others.... I'm in the camp of just making this place a better community for us all to visit. Some here think it's fine just the way it is. They can operate the way they have for years and because it's tolerated...it's okay. Change will always have its detractors. It's not easy and people avoid change like the plague. But, change can be a positive sometimes. Either way, i'd like to dream that the CGC forum could be a kinder gentler place...but then I woke up. I hope that you, along with MANY others, can see the need to have the uncivil behavior cease. But I, for one, am not seeing that. I am seeing the old Status Quo: shoot the messenger, defame, deny, deflect, destroy. All for what? I hope many are reading this thread, and especially the outsiders. I won't need to have them read myposts for the proper APPEARANCES of what this Forum has turned into. And? it is allowed, thus condoned. By many. but not by CAL
  10. That is right. No it's not, Cal. The simple fact that certain individuals don't share your opinion does not make them a troll. Constantly harrassing you in thread after thread on a daily, probably hourly, basis does. But simply having a mind of their own doesn't bestow upon them troll status. Ttrue. I read his post wrong. See Dupont. CAL in a hurry
  11. What does this have to do with? I never had anyone banned that did not deserve it. I am not the forum police. I am just a wanna-be forum poilceman who trades funny books as a hobby. CAL still confused
  12. Mark1, great post. But be warned, any appearance of agreeing with the membership idea will put you in my camp. I am getting snide remarks from people I did not know existed here, but because of the membership idea, it has brought them out if you know what I mean??? concerned CAL
  13. Why is there an assumed correlation between spending a few bucks, or the extent to which someone participates in the hobby, and sanity? I could pay $500 and submit 100 books a year to CGC; how exactly does that ensure that I won't act like a d-bag to other people in this community? It does not insure against bad behavior. But I am betting my Aces Full that you would fall under the PROBABILITY of civil behavior. You would have something to lose, versus the trolls who rarely have anything to lose. I stand behind my premise of the membership requirement, flawed or not. CAL is actually trying to make the place better for everyone Cal, have you been given a strike before? Yes. For supposdedly following Not*Sure. She also made a nasty reference inferred about me that was removed by the mods. What has that got to do with this? Curious CAL
  14. How many others have quit or not joined when they see these threats and other troll garbage? Yes hard to quantify but i know there has been several, if not dozens, who QUIT here. Add that to the many who REFUSE to join and now are on Comics Corral or other comic forums, and this number SHOULD be easy for us to figure out. By playing word-games, symantics, etc. is not helping. Arguing against a good idea( posted by OTHERS I am referring to) just smacks of the threat of someone not wanting to lose the ability to be rude and nasty when the mood strikes them. We all have our bad days. I am trying to eliminate the deliberate threaqts, abd other troll-like behavior. I stand behind my membership proposal and the more backlash I get against it, the more I think I am really closer to solving this problem. Roentgen, Marie Curie, Eienstein, Spike Lee, and many others were told to "go away, you are crazy...whatever. They were ahead of their times. CAL knows he is on to something big here...
  15. That is right. But this is not: You honesly have an inflated sense of self importance. I don't think you have enough money or cred to get a mod title. CAL
  16. This was from page 10 of this Thread If I were the Forum Plolice, I would have locked this Thread right here. CAL not going to give up You are saying you would have locked the thread long ago because the thread was "diverted"? Yes. Yet you have gone on long after championing your agenda? Yes. Why not? And you also claimed to not be hypocritical? No. Not "claimed". I CLAIM not to be hypocritical.. At least try to keep your ideas straight when you are telling the rest of us how we should be doing things. How about YOU coming up with some ideas to keep the libel and other trolling activity to a halt? We all can read. Some better than others. CAL who DOES keep his ideas straight
  17. Why is there an assumed correlation between spending a few bucks, or the extent to which someone participates in the hobby, and sanity? I could pay $500 and submit 100 books a year to CGC; how exactly does that ensure that I won't act like a d-bag to other people in this community? It does not insure against bad behavior. But I am betting my Aces Full that you would fall under the PROBABILITY of civil behavior. You would have something to lose, versus the trolls who rarely have anything to lose. I stand behind my premise of the membership requirement, flawed or not. CAL is actually trying to make the place better for everyone Maybe. Let's assume you're right: you're proposing altering the structure of this board - a board that has operated the same way for 10 years - just for an increased probability that people will be a little more civil to each other; in the process, you may be alienating a substantial number of existing positive, contributing members to this community, as well as possibly deterring future positive, contributing members from joining. Sounds like a steep price for increasing the "probability of civil behavior" in a place that, relative to other internet message boards, is already pretty darn civil. What about Randall Bartlett, who quit CGC becauseof the trolls? Why can't anyone see that CGC has ALREADY lost $$$ because of what goes on here? CAL must be ahead of his time...again
  18. You just gave me an idea... maybe they will let ME be a moderator. Wow! Things ARE looking up CAL You honesly have an inflated sense of self importance. I don't think you have enough money or cred to get a mod title. you and your kind...great brotherly love, pardner. Enjoy your trolls, because I am against them. You are against me, thus you must be a troll-lover CAL could not resist
  19. You just gave me an idea... maybe they will let ME be a moderator. Wow! Things ARE looking up CAL You honesly have an inflated sense of self importance. I don't think you have enough money or cred to get a mod title. You are wrong on one of the accounts. By a LONG shot. CAL
  20. This was from page 10 of this Thread If I were the Forum Plolice, I would have locked this Thread right here. CAL not going to give up
  21. You just gave me an idea... maybe they will let ME be a moderator. Wow! Things ARE looking up CAL Sarcasm doesn't help your case at the moment... :shrug: who said I was being sarcastic? I truly think that might be a great idea. Now let's see... they can be sarcastic to me, but... CAL sees things the way they are by their posts...
  22. Your due respect is appreciated and valued. CAL
  23. Why is there an assumed correlation between spending a few bucks, or the extent to which someone participates in the hobby, and sanity? I could pay $500 and submit 100 books a year to CGC; how exactly does that ensure that I won't act like a d-bag to other people in this community? It does not insure against bad behavior. But I am betting my Aces Full that you would fall under the PROBABILITY of civil behavior. You would have something to lose, versus the trolls who rarely have anything to lose. I stand behind my premise of the membership requirement, flawed or not. CAL is actually trying to make the place better for everyone
  24. You just gave me an idea... maybe they will let ME be a moderator. Wow! Things ARE looking up CAL
  25. how am I making enemies? just tell me straight CAL By being a d-bag being what you describe as a d-bag is condoning the very implication you just made. How is attempting to solve the Forums problem being a d-bag? please take it further CAL What if you are actually creating a second problem while doing nothing to solve the first? At what point do you think you have reached troll status? I know you think the amount of money we spend each month on comics and for how long we have been doing it is what matters, but I think you are alone on that. Other people here have a lot of money in their collections too, I don't see any of them belittling the rest of us for not having a years income stuffed in some longboxes. I don't see anybody else pointing out join dates as if it mattered. This is trolling. It may not be threatening, it may not be against the rules, but it is not the kind of behavior most people are receptive to. If you knew that then I think this is the very definition of trolling. If you didn't know that, now you do. I respect your attempt but after reading your entire sequence of your posts just FOR THIS THREAD I don't get you. You are very inconsistent with your latest messages. You start off well, agreeing that comicdona should not be threatened, but seem to veer way off course with my posts, particularly the solving the troll problems. 1) I ALWAYS put my CAL sig line. That is not what a troll does. Prove to me what the definition of a troll is, I am not on your wave-length with this one for sure; 2) If you had been reading the posts carefully like I asked you to when you confused me w/ Not*Sure you would have seen that there ARE some people wo agreed at least in part, of my ideas. They have been here a lot longer than you, and thus understand what is at stake; longetivity in itself is not a factor UNTIL the understanding what has happened here a long time ago. I never said you were a lesser memberbecause you are somewhat a newbie; I ALWAYS welcome all newbies and the most of the veterans here know this and would never admit it; 3) I know what kind of behavior people are receptive to. Do not patronize me.