And that gets at the heart of it.
Should a boardie be allowed to keep someone on the probation list out of anger even after they've done their best to fix the problem?
They should not.
In any and all situations, or in this particular instance?
So if, for arguements sake, I rip off a buyer and send a different book or take PayPal personal and don't send the book, the boardie I ripped off should be forced to accept, if and when I attempt to make amends? And if they choose not to, the perpetrator should be removed anyway?
It undermines the entire spirit of the list. It's not the fault of the wronged party for not agreeing to remove the individual, it's the fault of the individual who acted in whatever manner that landed them on the PL in the first place.
Am I missing something here? If you think someone's behaved so badly that they should never be forgiven, or be allowed to make amends, then put them in the HoS. The PL is meant to be temporary.
I agree here. It is why it is called a PROBATION list. The folks there are on Probation and given the opportunity to make amends.
Exactly. If we consider them incorrigible they go into the HOS. The probation list was designed to pressure people to complete transactions and warn boardies about them.
I just received a PM from a member asking what to do with a Megacon issue. They are pretty new and I directed them here and to the PL list where Megacon has been added.
Personally I think Megacon should be on the HOS. Especially as they were a banned user who came back under a different name.
+1