• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

clarkkentdds

Member
  • Posts

    866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by clarkkentdds

  1. On 2/26/2024 at 4:45 PM, szav said:

    This looks like it could be intentional CT trimming with the holes punched in it right?  ... will be very curious to see how the collectors in this range feel about that aspect of it too.   Does this book match any old purple label copies?

    image.png.458c4daa5c59bad0dc21683a1ef64c95.png

    This is criminal. Seriously... This is an iconic piece of history. I cannot believe CGC is promoting this.

  2. On 1/10/2024 at 9:45 AM, szav said:

    In my mind there is no difference between scraping off part of the book and trimming it.  You are physically removing part of the book to improve, in the minds of some, the grade, desirability, or perceived value of the book.  CT removal is itself restoration, it's absurd.

    I say this every time the topic comes up, but it's really the worst of all practices that CGC not only allows, but incentivizes.  It's a really bad policy.   A happy medium that CGC could adopt and still rake in more money would be to announce that books that are currently in purple holders for color touch alone could be regraded and given a blue label grade, if the owner so desires, that is the effective 'blue label grade if we were to scrape off the CT affected areas' without actually doing the harm to the book.  Think of how many resubs they'd get and all the $$$.

    Send in your purple 7.0 small amount of CT book, and get back a 5.5 blue label, or whatever it should be. that lists the CT in the graders notes and treats it more or less like a stain from a grading perspective.  Win win.

    I presented this idea on the boards years ago. CGC could give two grades: The current grade, (even if in a blue label) and the "potential grade" if pressing were done or resto removal. The potential grade would be an estimate, but all grading is subjective anyways. There is a market for this.

  3. Hello CGC,

    How do I request a correction to the census? A Superman #12 9.2 was graded and sold last year as seen in the Heritage archives. However, shortly after it's sale, it was regraded and actually went down in grade to an 8.5. So the current 9.2 on the census no longer exists as a 9.2. I can post pics of the book and you can see it is the same exact book. You can compare the scans on the HA auction archives. Can you please remove the 9.2 on the census to reflect the correct iteration as an 8.5? Thanks.

    Clark