I understand your view, but cgc shouldn't have a say in the secondary market I don't think this implicates them that way, as it wasn't done on purpose for the market. Grading fees and that's it?. That's the whole point that makes their value now, destroy that misstep to reputation or disable the reputation period and down come value.
I am almost positive this wasn't done on purpose, therefore the backtrack had to to be postulated for sure, and hiring someone might help, true!
Yet I don't think cgc has anything to gain in the first place other than grading fees, therefore this misstep and value on the secondary market means that "buy the book not the grade" to be touted more imo
That may devalue safely without ruining a company rep, especially one that doesn't have a lot to gain?