ADAMANTIUM

I almost thought it was the camera lens but no @CGC Mike If you look at the inner circle of the number "6" it is wider and etc. With no further explanation of if these are sealed and with cert numbers matching as well, this is alarming

and I had to edit The 6' 10" tall guy was the wrestler the Undertaker, if that was not clear

After looking at the thread, this one doesn't show up anymore, or is somehow lost and needs to be reuploaded. Pamela Anderson, me with a Barbwire comic I originally had her first day as the time for the photo, but that was to be so late to happen in the day (even at a con I have to think about homelife with dinner), so I rescheduled to the following day. Problem is I saw photos she took that 1st day, where she was decked out in a party dress and a lot more smiley (if that is a word ) which I regret rescheduling to the next day of her possible hangover

Ya I was trying to do the math, as 5 years ago a lot of people had posted here, but it was started around November, which is AFTER con season and maybe a better time to have bumped the thread haha. No worries

Good deal. It isn't pretty, but it is shady I agree, just idk a fix myself other than to vent and get out the word as you ARE doing.

Unscrupulous was a good word. It is just his dealing method, in a Grey area and so on, so not on the up and up. Ebay doesn't have a block seller list, but given this thread and any other heated response it might be good to put him on your block buyers list. Mark Jewelers aren't sectioned in the census and that said I didn't look how many 9.8s there were either. Knowing ebay, I know in the end it wouldn't have amounted to him being reprimanded. So this is the kind of thing to speak up about, and I have absolutely no opinion on how it turned out. If only to say it is good to speak up period the end, but I don't know of a fix. Because there isn't a fix. It is just a vent in frustration, which shouldn't be debated, it is what it be, just an Unscrupulous seller. It's unfortunate

Again you can't tell what issues of Mark jewelers there are by the census. The listing was hopeful at best

I understand but do want to interject that the census doesn't break out mark jeweler. 9.8s? Yes, so they'd see all the 9.8s in the census and think to themselves, this is the "only mark jeweler?" Take that with a grain of salt, too, because it is impossible for the census to even tell you how many mark jeweler there are. Same with signature series. Even Canadian or other price variants that may be broken out in the census is iffy, as cgc missed those early on.

I've noticed the power girls recently by different artists, all very striking in their own way! I like the one you posted, because the hair reminds me of older coins. Idk know if that is an interesting tidbit or relatable I do think it is cool 😎

@CGC Mike wasn't even the book he sent in? Not exactly a new boardie, but idk if I'm tattling or if they're fine with it, but the submission should be rectified as it isnt good for business

🕊️ hopefully

Myth confirmed that I have as a back cover picture to my Daredevil Canadian Mark Jewelers in the registry

Coming in at 6'10" the undertaker Taller than my brother who is 6'4"

Katie Sackoff for some odd reason in a slip and jacket

@F For Fake since you're around? People probably forgot about this thread, and yet though personal was boardie fun! Lord willing it is ok to As comic con season is now upon us and we made it through hard years of getting out in public due to world phenomenon! I hope others can share, would be fun, I guess, if this became a thing/theme? Idk Boondocks Saints!

They've been there most years, and I specifically remember last year. Although I think the events page doesn't have it registered yet, I'll check and Lord willing post if it gets updated!

I guess that is understandable, seeing how the label is the next issue of the book in the slab? I suppose when entering it got labeled the wrong issue, and therefore has all the info of #206 instead of correctly #205? I guess that makes sense.

I guess you mean the issue number then? That's enough, but is that it?