-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
23,576 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
CGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Get Marwood & I
-
-
-
So is this This one co-stars Bob Geldof, who plays a doity boomtown rat. And it's a Triple Price Variant! So good they priced it thrice. I've got a full whack of pence Barrys now, by the way.
-
-
You're in good company on that one riegler, thank you. There's a whole thread on the subject below if you're interested: https://boards.cgccomics.com/topic/488611-a-discussion-about-how-cgc-label-non-us-publications-which-reprint-reproduce-original-us-comic-content/?do=findComment&comment=12543719 CGC clearly aren't going to budge on this strategy, but it's always worth reminding them that they don't own the hobby every once in a while.
-
I don't give a flying fart at a rolling doughnut myself, but there are some here that might. I'm more concerned that it may represent missing content. I noticed this morning that some posts that I made in the test area did not add to my overall post count so that may explain the reduction that followed the upgrade. I expect they have made them ineligible to stop people from using the test area to reach the post count figure necessary to view certain forums - sale etc.
-
Thanks again @Albert Tatlock Challengers are now complete for the first four T&P stamp cycles. That gaggle of 'first' sixes gets bigger and bigger as the issues slowly roll in. But then they could just be late second cycle books, as we've discussed many times. Either way, the first in scope Challenger issue by cover date exists. I'm taking a break now boys. Play nicely, and be seeing you
-
The current census records for the three books are (regular/variant): LR #97 - 6/6 JIM #76 - 48/35 GW #68 - 5/13 Not huge volumes, and no surprise that the romance and western are some way behind the monster book. We know from the examples that I've posted in this thread that CGC haven't been consistent in the past so we can't be sure which of the two version groups the historic black circle book submissions sit in within those numbers. The available images do seem to suggest that they once regarded the black circle book as the variant and we don't know when they changed their mind on that - maybe it was your submission query that prompted their rethink / current stance, who knows. I think it was worth challenging the decision myself, even if the result wasn't what we had hoped for. I also thought a few more members here might have added their voice too. Maybe some more support of my argument might have given CGC further cause to reflect, but all they will see reading this thread is a 50/50 to and fro between me and namisgr. I failed to convince him, and they may take comfort from the fact that half of the interested parties agree with them. I suspect you won't be the last person to be disappointed by the labelling stance Tim, but there you go. The good news is that you have the current highest graded copy of any description and regardless of what is or isn't written on the label of the plastic encasing it, the book should always be the star