Mrs Muggins-migration

Cap #1 would be on my short list of all time great comics but I'd rather own a nice looking 4.0 than this one.

Not that I could afford either though.

Ditto. But as a confirmed printing error, the book is nigh on unique and in theory should be very desirable to certain collectors.

Well?

What am I missing?

Just looks faded to me.

That was my first thought but the total absence of red wording on the back cover, when compared to the other copy for sale, confirms the error. Didn't errors used to get qualified labels? Certainly seems more appropriate.

Good luck

Good man. I bet the difference is much more striking in the flesh.

If you have that kind of cash to spend, I don't think you would be on here asking for advice.

 

Your right I don't have that kind of cash, I can spend about 2K on a book, and I am sure this would be a good price for the buyer, then again he/she could say no. I have been collecting these Whitman's for awhile and trying to complete the set.

I feel for you Bloomis as I know what it's like to need that one book to complete a set. I had a similar 'buy or leave' conundrum with the ASM 184 All Detergent. Unfortunately, when certain books take on near mythical status, and that catches on, anyone who finds one puts an eye watering price tag on it. You can't really blame them, as it's likely a collector with deep pockets will bite rather than wait. I waited, and that patience was rewarded in the end. Only you know what you're prepared to pay. If you're uncomfortable, leave it. Make an offer which you think is reasonable. You never know.

Hello Shane. I cut the address into chrome and had a look. This happens when the inks are running low. Spectacular Spider-Man 160 is another good example. There are orange and red background covers out there. And they always look more striking in the flesh. I quite like them.

What I've started doing is a campaign of buying something cheap from these twerps-then I'll be leaving them some....feedback......

 

You're better than that Kav. Titties for tatties and all.

It's like that time I found a wallet-at first I was gonna keep it-then I thought, how would I feel if I lost my wallet? Then I realized I WOULD WANT TO BE TAUGHT A LESSON!

 

So how would you feel if you did lose it, then someone posted it back to you all contents included?

Like I didn't learn my LESSON.

Sorry, I was having my dinner. What was we talking about again?

What I've started doing is a campaign of buying something cheap from these twerps-then I'll be leaving them some....feedback......

 

You're better than that Kav. Titties for tatties and all.

It's like that time I found a wallet-at first I was gonna keep it-then I thought, how would I feel if I lost my wallet? Then I realized I WOULD WANT TO BE TAUGHT A LESSON!

So how would you feel if you did lose it, then someone posted it back to you all contents included?

What I've started doing is a campaign of buying something cheap from these twerps-then I'll be leaving them some....feedback......

You're better than that Kav. Titties for tatties and all.

Hello,

There is a category here:

Celebrate The Printing Errors

It's difficult to tell from scans sometimes, especially with Chromium Covers which don't picture well, but it does look like the red ink is missing / erratic on this copy. I can't see another on Ebay so well done on the find

Fro!

Good thread Kav! I know you've raised it half in jest, but as the replies show, it is annoying when people don't leave feedback. Especially when you've given great service. I have always left feedback for every sale and every purchase but I accept that some won't. It probably doesn't mean they're bad people, just that they have different priorities in life.

I used to think that ebay should leave auto positive feedback after a month or so if a buyer didn't bother. That would help improve the standings of sellers and seems fair. What do you think?

 

Review part 2

 

 

Your just paid 15 bucks for a ticket, 7 bucks for a 50cent bucket of popcorn..4 bucks for a overfilled iced soda.....in La parking.....need I say more....

 

No.

 

and if you did..well PT Barnum said it best......

He did. Which minute were you born? Yesterday from the sounds of it.

God dammit Porcupine, this one has already been done! ?

Jerkfro The Barbarian.

BVS ROCKS!!!!

 

Now that's a good review. Read, digest and learn.

 

It's to the point. And let's face it, it wasn't a bad bit of entertainment. It certainly wasn't a dog.

Then it's settled.

BVS ROCKS!!!!

Now that's a good review. Read, digest and learn.

the Jerkfro

We've been waiting 50 pages for it and here it finally is

Folks let be real..lets call a dog a dog when it really was..you have factor in the "unlimited checkbook" to see the true level of incompetence.....Folks Mr bedrock could have made a better movie with only 100 million, David at 50 mil....this was the BIGGEST WASTE OF 275 MILLIONS DOLLARS PLUS MARKETING COSTS ETC. ever in

the history of motion pictures. For what...really Zack is a Sad Sack and folks...I respect and like "heaven gate" which I own a copy of the blue ray directors cut .... and heck "Gator" could have been a better Luthor.

 

Oh alright then. Your review is a dog.

 

 

my review was spot on at the time....the biggest waste of 275 million and its closer to 295 Million and its probably more thats what they admitted to...you have become " NUMB TO DUMB'...accepting total pretty special effects pile of DUNG for what a real movie, with heart is. I venture to say that I or even you could have done a much better job with the -script, acting etc ..now we don't have carmine infantino's original superman here which Puzo stole the credit for and it should of be shared....that is the movie which really jump started it all.. Please stop being numb to dumb dung that the masses have come to accept ..Donners superman and as you are aware...they took one movie and divided it into two to make more money...if combined superman one and two it would be the greatest superhero movie ever made up today also.

 

lets take Doctor Strange...a super hero movie who took a chance.. with a real -script and actors at a little over half the price ,now that is what I am taking about......Sup V Bat...are you kidding me.....and the special added 30 minutes did not change anything in my book, it was however better Dung.

 

Sir with all due respect please RASIE you standards...

 

My standards are just fine thank you. But I humbly suggest that you raise you I.Q.

 

"show me the money"....what is your review....

If you give your review, I'll give mine. So far, all I have seen from you is borderline incoherent ranting, largely about dung and budgets. Try a little harder and maybe I'll increase my own input.

Folks let be real..lets call a dog a dog when it really was..you have factor in the "unlimited checkbook" to see the true level of incompetence.....Folks Mr bedrock could have made a better movie with only 100 million, David at 50 mil....this was the BIGGEST WASTE OF 275 MILLIONS DOLLARS PLUS MARKETING COSTS ETC. ever in

the history of motion pictures. For what...really Zack is a Sad Sack and folks...I respect and like "heaven gate" which I own a copy of the blue ray directors cut .... and heck "Gator" could have been a better Luthor.

 

Oh alright then. Your review is a dog.

 

 

my review was spot on at the time....the biggest waste of 275 million and its closer to 295 Million and its probably more thats what they admitted to...you have become " NUMB TO DUMB'...accepting total pretty special effects pile of DUNG for what a real movie, with heart is. I venture to say that I or even you could have done a much better job with the -script, acting etc ..now we don't have carmine infantino's original superman here which Puzo stole the credit for and it should of be shared....that is the movie which really jump started it all.. Please stop being numb to dumb dung that the masses have come to accept ..Donners superman and as you are aware...they took one movie and divided it into two to make more money...if combined superman one and two it would be the greatest superhero movie ever made up today also.

 

lets take Doctor Strange...a super hero movie who took a chance.. with a real -script and actors at a little over half the price ,now that is what I am taking about......Sup V Bat...are you kidding me.....and the special added 30 minutes did not change anything in my book, it was however better Dung.

 

Sir with all due respect please RASIE you standards...

My standards are just fine thank you. But I humbly suggest that you raise you I.Q.

Folks let be real..lets call a dog a dog when it really was..you have factor in the "unlimited checkbook" to see the true level of incompetence.....Folks Mr bedrock could have made a better movie with only 100 million, David at 50 mil....this was the BIGGEST WASTE OF 275 MILLIONS DOLLARS PLUS MARKETING COSTS ETC. ever in

the history of motion pictures. For what...really Zack is a Sad Sack and folks...I respect and like "heaven gate" which I own a copy of the blue ray directors cut .... and heck "Gator" could have been a better Luthor.

Oh alright then. Your review is a dog.

JerkFroZEN?

Prize winner

Jerkfro at The Gallop.