• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Greenlake

Member
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Greenlake

  1. 14 hours ago, Shadow Images said:

    Can someone explain to me the thinking of seller who resist books and increase the price? It didn't sell at $100 so its going to at $150?  These are not hot or key books.

    Them not being hot books might be partly why. I've done it after I was trying to offload books quickly by listing them at a low price. They didn't sell, and I decided it's just because they're books that aren't looked for that often on eBay. Stuff like mid-grade single-digit Avengers. So I relisted them more in line with past sales and they did eventually sell, often without another relist.

  2. Wow, those Batman 139s went very cheap compared to recent auctions. I was the underbidder on the 6.5 with a joke bid I tossed off in the middle of making tons of marker bids. The 5.5 went for $527 tonight whereas back in October I was underbidder on a 5.5 that ended at $705. Too bad I have other priorities this auction and not enough money.

  3. 1 hour ago, mattn792 said:

    I’ve always wondered where this fight was taking place in order for Beast to have that strategically placed swing available from which to mount his attack...

    It's at one of the millions of places in the world where there's a pure white background with no color variation or shadows.

    I've never liked that cover as much as I wanted to. X-men 12 is a similar composition but much better IMO.

  4. On almost anything valuable or fragile I buy (not just comics) during colder months, I let the unopened box sit for several hours. Fast changes in temperature are never good and it can take a while for the inside to get up to room temperature. I did once get sloppy and open up a package with a graded card pretty soon after getting it; it started to fog up immediately so I shoved it back in the packaging and left it alone. It turned out okay.

  5. 25 minutes ago, lizards2 said:

    Did someone already hit the notify button?  I can't find it.  Sorry this thread got torpedoed by two yahoos and their politics.

    Sorry about that. I was cool with your reply, but then he went again and I guess I should've let it go.

     

    Edit, to get back to the topic: I have horror stories with all the services on personal packages at some point, but I use USPS for my hobby business and so far the failure rate has been around 1%. I think some of that is dumb luck, but the packages also run on the small side. I think they might be worse the larger the package, although so far no problems with comics yet.

  6. 19 minutes ago, vodou said:

    Woman didn't work for me at all, it's Jeffrey in drag (not that there's anything wrong with that!) I would have bid Swordsman up to 3k (which was really only 1 more + maybe a cut up from hammer) but not higher. Alas, I'd already taken down two other pieces earlier and my budget was blown. It's a larger piece but suffers from being later (90s) and unpublished, still thought it would get to 6500 or so, the JJ market took a hit last summer when so many lots passed at PIH but seemed to have recovered this year. Oh well. None of that matters to me except that I wouldn't overpay and certainly not 'reach'; my line was 3k. JJ market has some quirks, to say the least ;)

    I'm really reaching here since I'm a beginner, but I thought maybe WiW would've been better placed in a fine arts auction -- especially since it didn't fit with the other three and I thought it was destined to start things off low. You'd lose the name recognition, but I think it's a fair bet you could find the right buyers for it and the story would help. I play in the OA shallow end and I doubt I'd have gone for it anyway, but I wish I'd have known it was a self-portrait.

  7. I got back into collecting this year and the amount of money talk and hyping here has soured me a little, but the board's also opened my eyes to things I like that I wouldn't have considered before. I also am in the middle of resolving a problem with an auction house over what is likely a tampered slab, which unfortunately is currently the most expensive book I have. It sounds like they're probably going to do the right thing, but either way it goes to show money can turn a hobby of enjoyment into something else. Between that problem and having more time and experience to know what I really want and value, I think I'm going to get rid of all but a few of the slabbed keys I bought and slow down on buying pricier (to me) books. I'm not quitting the hobby, but definitely changing focus to other parts of it.

  8. 6 hours ago, DavidTheDavid said:

    I bought a raw hulk#2, stated grade 2.0. the cover was detached, cgc called it a 1.0. I don't but their raws no mo.

    Yeah, this thread is building up anecdotes of people having bad experiences with their lower grade books. I'll still give them a shot on mid or higher books -- where I'm more comfortable saying "this isn't correct" without having to get it professionally graded -- but I'll stick to something cheap to begin with.

  9. Alright, they're a total failure and everyone should run away from them. In particular you'd have to be a real insufficiently_thoughtful_person to buy the Tec 66 and ASM 1 8.5 at Heritage, so if you bid on those the smart thing is to call them until they let you retract the bids. And if Heritage tells you your old bid on one of them is now the highest, refuse. Let's see if some poor sucker who happens to live in my house buys them for the minimum bid. Then we can all laugh at them.

  10. 31 minutes ago, kimik said:

    Just like anywhere, it can be hit and miss. Sometimes you win and the books come back higher, sometimes they are lower, but if you look at the scans carefully then you should be okay.

    I got a book from them recently that had part of the first page ripped away from the rest and stuck to the front cover. I'm not enough of an expert on lower grades to say for certain it was overgraded -- though my guess is it's a 2.0, not a 3.0 -- but the lack of disclosure bothers me.