RockMyAmadeus

On 6/4/2024 at 11:50 AM, KAIKAIKIKI said:

 I heard that the fifth number can tell whether it is the first print, but mine is 6. It should be 1 right? Can anyone tell me why? Thanks 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/395445205481

On 6/3/2024 at 9:15 PM, NewWorldOrder said:

 I never understood why all of you just don't set a min in the offer level...

On 6/3/2024 at 5:50 PM, asteroid-comix said:

 ...better than the CGC witness sig holder. 

On 5/28/2024 at 7:46 PM, Warlord said:

Only five more years until this thread becomes popular due to us being nostalgic about it from our childhood! 

On 5/31/2024 at 10:35 AM, buttock said:

lousy press job. 

On 5/31/2024 at 2:17 PM, mattn792 said:

On 5/31/2024 at 12:43 PM, valiantman said:

Expand  

And we have six more months of 2024 still to come…

On 5/31/2024 at 12:13 PM, Cman429 said:

but nobody likes me here

On 5/31/2024 at 6:59 AM, Gator Guru said:

9.9s are coming and from the looks of things there will be plenty

On 5/31/2024 at 6:59 AM, Gator Guru said:

Obviously you are one of the barcode boys so I know this hurts you dearly but its not too late to unload your precious barcode books.

On 5/31/2024 at 5:24 AM, pmpknface said:

Ok, so I was kinda right - it does LOOK like one!  It's just correctly not labeled.

On 5/31/2024 at 5:15 AM, lostboys said:

I love reading through this thread.

 

Cracks me up that folks will block potential buyers over such minor incidents but will keep using CGC no matter what.

On 10/26/2017 at 4:10 AM, The_Investor said:

Also reach out to Jon McClure who is a Comic Book historian and discovered the 30/35 cent cover price variants that we all collect today thanks to him.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/275635565122

On 5/24/2024 at 7:07 AM, pmpknface said:

Not labeled as a NS issue, but looks like one

On 5/29/2024 at 4:57 PM, trademarkcomics said:

Obviously, they have been capped out at 9.8 since they are so new. 

On 5/29/2024 at 3:58 PM, LordRahl said:

I have submitted dozens of each of those and I swear some of them should have been 9.9/10s but since CGC was artificially holding back those grades, they only got 9.8s. And I fully believe as I've stated here on the boards in the past, that CGC was in fact artificially holding those back and not giving them to books that were deserving.