• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

10centcomics

Member
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 10centcomics

  1. On 4/14/2024 at 3:09 PM, KryptoSpidey said:

    NEXT UP...

    TTA # 27 CCG 2.5 CR/OW

    This is a REALLY PRETTY book for the grade...especially the front cover....CGC Scan and Picts this time....(forgot I had the CGC images for the Xmen 13)...

    Last GPAs ...

    1.8 $1750 Dec 2023

    2.0 $1750 March

    2.5 2024 ($1560,1700,2040)

    $1800 SHIPPED USA

     

    CGC4342598-002_OBV.jpeg

    CGC4342598-002_REV.jpeg

    IMG_20240414_134941.jpg

    IMG_20240414_134957.jpg

    :takeit:

  2. On 9/18/2023 at 9:59 PM, N e r V said:

     

    Great Caesar’s Ghost! My old stomping grounds the MarvelMasterworks boards. I even had a post on that thread you linked. I’ve heard arguments for both sides and still no one has produced enough evidence to sway me one way or another. I think most of these arguments should be left at “I think” instead “It is or isn’t” as a fact without a smoking gun to prove your “opinion”. The fighting is tiring. We live in an age of comic covers as art and I don’t believe a lot of prices move up or down if it’s not the cover artist you think it is. A great cover is always going to be a great cover no matter who or who didn’t draw it.

    Generally if we are unsure of something, we should default to "uncredited" or "unknown." Older CGC labels of PL17 don't have the Matt Baker cover credit. I wonder when it changed and what evidence CGC saw that made them change their mind. I agree the value of PL17 isn't going to be swayed by the cover artist because it will always be a historic, infamous, and iconic book in the hobby. But attaching Matt Baker's name to a previously unknown book would certainly boost its value.

  3. On 8/29/2023 at 4:02 PM, M-F0uRce99 said:

    A CGC 3.5 Young Romance #1 sold on ebay a couple of days ago for $1400. I know this question is subjective, but- How would you figure the approximate value a CGC graded 5.5 of the same issue. I checked GPAnalysis and it appears that a 5.5 has never come to market. Thanks in advance for your replies.

    The easiest way is to calculate the price per point of the actual sale and then extrapolate for your copy. So 1400/3.5 = 400. 400 x 5.5 = $2200. You can adjust upwards or downwards then based on page quality or eye appeal, etc. Price per point works okay for the low to mid grades. Higher grade books tend to have more of a premium as they are rarer. You can also take a look at the census and see how rare a 5.5 is. If 5.5 is the highest grade for the book, you can get away with more of a premium. Hope that helps.

  4. On 8/28/2023 at 8:13 PM, Telegan said:

    Lol.  This is part of the aggravation for many people. :)

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but during the auction, the BP is not included in the current bid price you see.  After the auction, the BP is included in the "sold for" price, but the text that states a 15% BP will be added at the conclusion of the auction still remains, I guess.

    So in this instance, the final bid that won the comic book was $4200 + 15% BP = $4830 total (again, assuming that $4830 really does include the BP).

    Yep this is correct. The BP doesn't automatically show during the auction, you have to account for it yourself when you bid.

  5. On 8/22/2023 at 2:22 PM, LadyDeath said:

    Isn't it up for debate if Baker even drew this cover?

    Ah yes my favorite topic! I don't think there is any possibility Baker drew this. Hair, eyes, hands, chest, and wooden pose all do not look like Baker's work. The heavy shadows and wrinkles on the shirt look like classic Al Feldstein. (Although in the The Art of Glamour there is an interview with Al Feldstein and he only recalls doing minor inks and backgrounds on Phantom Lady, not the covers) I'm not sure where the Baker attribution came from. I think there was some signed Baker interior Phantom Lady art and folks then just assumed he might've drawn the covers as well.

    This classic debate pops up from time to time in the Baker thread here. (I copied over some of my comments from there).

     

     

     

  6. "Save on your purchase with our exclusive coupon code "FIRSTORDER10" Get a 10% discount when you spend over 3k$. Hurry, offer expires in 7 days. Shop now and enter the code at checkout."

    Offering discount codes on rare GA mega-keys. No way this was a legit sale. Seller has 0 feedback and created the account on August 9th?

  7. On 8/18/2023 at 10:02 PM, comicnoir said:

    I met Feldstein twice and we talked about Baker and how he influenced him, but nothing about PL17.

    Yeah in the The Art of Glamour there is an interview with Al Feldstein and he only recalls doing minor inks and backgrounds on Phantom Lady, not the covers. So the mystery continues...

  8. On 8/18/2023 at 9:47 PM, comicjack said:

    The hands give it away for me he was so much better than that 

    Hair, eyes, hands, chest, and wooden pose all do not look like Baker's work. The heavy shadows and wrinkles on the shirt look like classic Al Feldstein. I'm not sure where the Baker attribution came from. I think there was some signed Baker interior Phantom Lady art and folks then just assumed he might've drawn the covers as well? 

  9. On 8/18/2023 at 9:27 PM, comicjack said:

    One can say that about Phantom Lady 17 also they all most likely had some input on many books from what i see 

    Yeah I'll take it a step further with Phantom Lady 17 and confidently say Baker did not draw that cover. Does not look like anything else he has done.

  10. On 8/18/2023 at 8:53 PM, manetteska said:

    I guess I'm a bit out of touch on the Jo-Jo #25; I thought that price was crazy until I looked up recent sales -- seems line.

    Is it definitely a Baker cover?

    There is some doubt about that one. In The Art of Glamour, there is a footnote that says it could be an Iger Studio artist swiping Baker's style.