• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Latverian Tourism Board

Member
  • Posts

    275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Latverian Tourism Board

  1. 11 hours ago, Rick2you2 said:

    Howard Chaykin uses an unusual process these days on his independent books. He draws the main figures on separate panels, generally having assistants do the backgrounds, and then assembles the panels as pages in Photoshop. My understanding is that he is not allowed to engage in panel assembly like this on his DC or Marvel book work.

    Frankly, I'm not thrilled with that process. He could be very creative in his panel designs, and using the Photoshop approach can severely limit this. I spoke to him about it, and he understood (he also seemed to miss adding them), but he pointed out that this method is quicker, and for artists, there are business considerations (time is money).

    He remains one of my favorites.

    That is a very unusual process. Obviously, it speeds everything up, and get him more pay, but I’d imagine it kills OA resale value. I wonder how much it bothers comic artists when they have to settle on making the art they want to make a few more $.
     

    I dig Chaykin’s work, too. Thanks for sharing.

  2. Just now, vodou said:

    Great idea, will be informative to many. One huge caveat: we're talking artists here so they can and do change things up a little or a lot at any time, nothing is set in stone, "how it's done" today has zero bearing on yesterday or tomorrow...per se ;)

     

    Fantastic point. Showing artists evolution would be great, imo. I’m going to add that to the first post.

  3. There was an interesting conversation in the blue lines vs blue scans thread about some modern artists, and how they produce their work. The discussion was going over digital work vs hybrid digital and pen/ink work, and it occurred to me that there might be an interest in having a broader discussion on various artist’s processes, so let’s see if that’s the case. Oh, and not just for modern comic artists, but for all time periods.

    I will start it off, but I’d like this to be open to everyone, so it won’t just be me going through all the artist’s processes. Also, I don’t know them, so that thread would totally suck.

    So, do you have a favorite artist that you’re knowledgeable about? Are you a professional in the comic industry? Are you an artist yourself? Please, feel free to share. If you’d like to talk about general artistic practices from different time periods, or how an artist’s process has evolved over time (ty, Vodou), I think that’d be appreciated, too. 

  4. 7 hours ago, Rick2you2 said:

    That it was. Tom Fowler, Books of Magic, 2nd Series. He does the initial drawing on his computer, prints it and then inks the copy. You can see blue lines all over the inked page. The blue lines make it appear that he made some adjustments to the final page since some of them are different than the actual ink job. 

    Pencils are more important to the overall design of the page, but inks give the impact and adjust the final product. I like to think of it in building terms. The inking is like the facade (brick, stucco, etc.) and the detailing (trim pieces, window styles). The pencils are the structure (foundation, columns, walls). You can make a well built building look like cr*p with bad facade/detailing work. You can cover up a mediocre construction job with great facade/detailing work.

    I learned when I picked up a cover of his that Nick Bradshaw’s process is much the same. Loose “pencils” on a computer, then he prints it out in a faint red, and finishes with pencil and ink to find the final lines and add an insane amount of detail.

    I wonder if that is the method for a lot of new comic artists nowadays?

  5. 37 minutes ago, RBerman said:

    The main benefit is in production. No costs for shipping stacks of big pieces of thick paper between various members of the production team. No risk of damage or loss en route. Much quicker.

    The fringe benefit is that instead of the "penciler gets 2/3 of the pages; inker gets 1/3 of the pages" arrangement, both the penciler and inker can have all of their own pages to save or to sell on the collectibles market.

    That makes perfect sense. Of course it would be bottom dollar and production speed related. Thank you so much for explaining. 
     

    And, yeah, I see how that would be much more equitable for both. Interesting stuff. There is a lot to the process that is fascinating.

  6. 1 hour ago, stinkininkin said:

    Some of you guys are getting blue lines confused. Blue lines used to refer to a coloring process, where the hand drawn inks were printed in blue lines (at a reduced size) which would be directly colored on top of, paired with a black acetate overlay. This layer combination would then be photographed and be the final art used to print the comic, like the Dark Knight Returns example listed above. This technique is virtually obsolete today.

    Blue lines can also refer to simply using blue colored pencil as either an underdrawing or even final line drawing prior to inking. It has been a process option for many many decades going back to before the silver age of comics. Some artists also use green and red line colored pencils to achieve the same goal.

    Blue line for inks is where the pencils (either digital or traditional graphite) are converted/printed to blue to be inked on top of. Some artists prefer other colors to blue that can be also be removed in the production process, and even a basic grey line can work too. Not sure when all of this started to become common, but it's certainly been building over the last 10-15 years. 

    Thank you for taking the time to explain. I clearly was confused by the Dark Knight example I read online, too, like that other poster. So, that’s a similar name, but different process, and the scan concerns (not being original pencils) that are being discussed up thread are different and not a “problem” for collectors until more the late 90s early 2000s. 
     

    Blue pencils used to make me nervous, until I read up on how they differed from blue line that were printed for inkers to work on. Luckily, it’s not too difficult to tell the difference. If you don’t mind me asking, was the change just to speed up the process, or was it a mix of distance between artists and a new technology to help? Both? I’m curious, too.

  7. 1 hour ago, John E. said:

    Bumping this. 
     

    I’m also curious to know when the practice of a penciler scanning their page for an inker to ink on a separate board started?
     

    Related, when did going all-digital become a thing? For example, Alex Maleev on Daredevil in 2004. I don’t know much about this history, would like to know more  

     

    From a collector’s perspective, and from what I’ve read, is that the late 80s is when blue line scans really became more widely used. I think the first example was Dark Knight, as mentioned above. Keep in mind, though, some artists liked sketching in blue pencil, which can look very similar. Sal Buscema did a lot (most?) of his work with a blue pencil. Same with Alan Davis, and even some more modern artists like Frank Quitely. 
     

    Sometimes, the blue pencil lines are neat, and can look like a scan. If so, you just look closely, and see if it’s slightly waxy, like a crayon. If it is, it’s pencil, and not a scan. In Quitely’s case, he starts out with really sketchy blue lines and finds his final lines from there, so it’s obviously pencil work. The blue lines don’t scan when they turn the OA into comics.

    I’m not versed at all on the digital switch. 

  8. 58 minutes ago, stinkininkin said:

    It's not a recreation. The line work and signature match exactly.  There are always multiple variations with recreations. This was the real deal, and looks great.

    Thanks for the verification. I figured as much, but don’t feel knowledgeable enough to say definitively. It looked right to me, but I’m not a professional. 
     

    Someone got an amazing piece! 

  9. I don’t buy a lot of comics anymore, focusing more on my original art collection. I’m super focused on a few Timely GA titles, and bizarre, hard-to-find comics that strike my fancy (like Mr A by Ditko). I tend to save up my comic want lists for conventions (mostly SDCC). It’s not a result of any perceived lessening of comic quality on my part, just a by-product of a big collection that my wife would appreciate staying merely massive, and not a sprawling hoarder nightmare.
     

    Nostalgia is definitely a main focus for all my older art pages (up to the late 90s-2000), but for newer art I am primarily focusing on characters I like. That way, I’m getting art I love, and then I go get the associated comics. It helps me stay somewhat current, and keeps my collection fresh (to me). I also tend to go one new artist at a time until I get a few pieces I really like. Currently, I’m on Nick Bradshaw (Wolverine and the Thing). 

    Great question!

  10. 25 minutes ago, BuraddoRun said:

    I have, and Spencer did actually email me back not too long after I inquired. Unfortunately, he told me that all his Brigman Power Pack art is sold out. I might have found someone on CAF willing to sell, but after the first response a few days ago I haven't heard anything.

    Oh, sorry. They’ll come loose eventually.

    Hey, I’d you haven’t already, you can sign up on comic art tracker, and add that search to your favorites. If any pages come up, it’ll show up in your daily update email. 

  11. 27 minutes ago, Rick2you2 said:

    His lack of responsiveness is well known. But, he is also well-liked, knowledgeable and honest. I think there is a thread about him.

    Yeah, he seems very nice. He was very solicitous about taking so long, and brought up similar pages to see if I was interested. He told me that he was VERY sick in February, and now he is months behind. I wouldn’t suggest to anyone not to use him, just to be patient. 

  12. On 8/20/2020 at 11:05 PM, BuraddoRun said:

    Well, I hesitate to add to this topic because my budget isn't super high, but I'm sure not seeing any available Power Pack interior pages by June Brigman. Some dealer sites have them listed but when I've inquired, they say they've already sold them. Even the covers, which I'm not ready to commit to, are rare. I inquired about 1 and was told it had already sold. Another shows in different places as available. But anyway, I'd love to add interiors, even just 1, to my collection. I'm currently reading the old series and really enjoying it, and she is the definitive Power Pack artist in my opinion (though Bogdanove did them justice as well). She helped create them, after all.

    Have you ever checked out The Artists Choice? It looks like Spencer reps June Brigman, and has Power Pack pages. Fair warning, though, he’s really behind in responses, and can take a long time to respond. Nice guy, though, with great prices.