• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Aman619

Member
  • Posts

    19,703
  • Joined

Everything posted by Aman619

  1. Looking at the American Spidey 96 cover, I now see that the artwork is actually one big stat, a print of the art. What could have happened is that Gil Kane drew it the usual width, but Marvel added that strip down the left side. So they had to move Gil’s image to the right. therefore Gil May have drawn the policeman on the right intending for it to appear on the cover. And it wouldn’t have needed to be drawn later. If Marvel sent them a stat of the artwork alone, not the US final cover layout, then yes, no extra drawing would have been necessary. But as you see on the original art shown above, the template cover boards pencillers and inkers worked on have printed lines. Nobody was drawing outside them with extra wider art for other markets overseas.
  2. American covers were drawn on boards with proper trim area lines already blue lined for the pencillers. Often with black lines around the art area. There was little reason for American inkers and pencillers to draw extra stuff outside the margins for free. I don’t know much about overseas cover designs, and how often they changed them up as we do here. That is to say, I’m commenting on THIS cover art where the current overseas cover design only allowed for a wider art area than what was created for Marvels original cover. Similar to the 70s era Marvels... Generally over the years, American comics were 7x10 proportions, so all cover art was vertical and depending on the logo at top used art imagery that would be too tall to fit into the window box design of this current overseas design. So extra artwork would be needed in cases like this, but not when overseas covers were same proportions as ours. anyway, the extra art is pretty easy because it’s just binges and like here the missing parts of clothes etc. before photoshop cloning, everybody had to create more art all the time, so it wasn’t a big deal. if you manage to post examples Or links I can see if my guess here hold up or not.
  3. Problem for the UK here was that given their large masthead, the art area left over was very square. They couldn’t fit the vertical US cover artwork in the square box. Normally they just take what they were given and reduce the size to crop something out to fill the wider shorter area. But on this cover, they have to cut off the dead body, OR, Spidey! Looks like they ponied up the dough to have somebody add some artwork on the right.
  4. he once bragged to me that mail order was a piece of cake. That 9 out 10 buyers who were duped would just take it and never as for a refund. He only had to deal with the rest. I almost pulled the trigger on a Tec 27 in VG. It was the nicest of the 3 copies he had at the time. But I dodged a bullet. I figured that after my 10 time payments, Id get whatever copy he had lying around in stock, and that to would probably be restored too. The local comics/baseball card store would tell me that he'd come in to buy beater cards, markers and razors... and show off his Babe Ruth signature and brag how'd the VGs he bought would be autographed NMs soon. This worked like a charm until a customer he cheated turned out to be the DAs son! oops.
  5. i got curious to search for any videos of comics production. Found one. It was shot by Alan Light, founder of the CBG newspaper, on a tour of the Sparta plant in 1977. Sit through the fluff until around the 8 minute mark where the tram arrives at the comics area of the plant. A couple of notes I made relative to our discussions here. Their "new" system could print 42000 comics an hour. Each plate could last for over a million impressions (their previous lead based plates could only mange 350000 before needing to be replaced. You can see piles of pre printed covers with multiple covers on each, he notes that its weird to see covers from different publishers on the same printed sheets! It was all about getting them printed and out the door. The tour guide commented that every Indian Jones sized pile of printed magazines would be gone in 24 hours!, only to be replaced by all new product to skip out. At the 10 minute mark you can see the film negatives being worked on ("stripped"). then the film abruptly ends. Note: this has been posted here on the boards over the years.... but always fun to revisit!
  6. Maybe not from the “Source” — meaning direct from a collector. But it sure put him on the map to dealers as to who to call to to sell expensive books to!
  7. I see your point about Rawhide Kid cover changes. Somehow that makes sense even though Id just argued that they be 2nd printings. But you included a lot of press mishaps that force a shutdown of the press run, but NONE are the same as an intentional stoppage to now print "SOMETHING ELSE". SO its the intent Im speaking to and not just that a delay happened in the printing. In the larger sense though all variant printed same day/time, same place etc could then all be first printings. happy? As for the 4 up, I was winging on memory. The sheets had at least 6 covers as a google search reminded me. With 6 covers on a page, only 16% would have been for overseas etc -- a more reasonable % of the total run. still a bit high though. I can think of various ways to separate the different covers into bundles... all relatively light technology plus manual labor. I just don't know what they did when so I can only point out the potential problem. However, they most definitely ganged up multiple books on one press sheet of glossy paper. Much more economical to print large sheets and cut them down and collate than single press runs on small paper (11x17 is all a comic cover needs! and that a ridiculously small a tediously slow method to bang out 1000s of comics.) We have seen some comics with the wrong covers that came out at same time, which is indicative of the ganged up cover sheets, and that however they sorted them (before or after) mixups did occur from time to time.
  8. I’m on board calling these variants because having been printed at the same time here in the states, then shipped overseas just to be distributed elsewhere, they are like cousins, closely related kin of each other. As opposed to having been printed separately and some time later on IN BRITAIN as was what we suspected before Maywood examined these books more closely. However, I’m unclear how they are “First printings” until we know the printing scenario. "First printings" would mean to me that the printing press never stopped to replace the plates and run off the rest of the print run. Are we confident this was the case? To me, any time the presses have to be stopped to replace and print out a second version, that second batch is a second printing. having said that, it’s gets tricky. I know printing but aren’t 100% sure how the comics business actually processed their books. So here are ideas that would explain how either the US or the UK versions covers might be first printings, or in fact second printings. Covers were always printed separately and on different presses than the web printed newsprint interiors. After both were printed, other machines folded, collated and stapled and trimmed the covers onto the interiors. If the newsprint interiors are exactly identical down to the last detail it suggests ALL US and Thorpe etc copes were printed non stop in one sitting. So far so good. The covers though may have required two printing sessions. Either the larger print order of US covers were run off first, and afterward presses stopped and new UK plates loaded and a second press run produced the UK versions (or in the reverse order, UK first). Or, since the covers were printed on larger sheets 4-up (meaning 4 different covers on each sheet) they COULD have created a sheet with 3 US versions and 1 UK version and printed them all in one pass. If this were the case that’s means they are all first printings with neither having been printed first or second. Because the collating machine would have stapled and trimmed etc all at the same time, and they just separated the bundles afterward. (digression: but here again, Im not sure of each step in the process. In order for all the Thorpe covers to be collated together, they'd have to have been trimmed out of the 4-up cover sheets and separated into their OWN PILE first, apart from the US covers ... but I don't think they did that because films of these comics collators fed in the unfolded newsprint interior which were folded into signatures of 16 pages and the 4-up covers trimmed down as well ALL AT SAME TIME IN SAME MACHINE. or were they? At some point they needed to be able to have separate bundles of EACH different comic! So steps needed to be taken to make that happen, same here with different covers variants.. So -- did England really need that many copies? That would mean Britain's circulation was 1/3 as that of the entire US? Sounds too high. I’d think that England only need 10% as many, and if closer to that % Marvel and Thorpe would not have gone this way because it’s too wasteful. They’d end up with maybe 3 times as many unnecessary UK covers as they kept the presses churning out the much higher print run of US covers they needed. What I’m saying is that IF England only needs 10% of the US total, they would have opted for stopping the presses and swapping plates to print the other covers to save money. And in my mind, that’s a second printing.
  9. I feel like ive been rumplestilskinned, but in a good way! Ok. Hers what I can add to the blue mystery. In printing, black ink is the darkest of the 4 inks. But, even black ink can look NOT dark enough when printed over white paper. The reason has to do with paper stock, even glossy paper, is really at a microscopic scale actually like a lawn of grass. It’s not perfectly flat, but rather “hairy” as the wood pulp resembles a pile of twigs, or as I said, a lawn of grass. when the presses lay down the inks, you don’t get total coverage, some of the white shows and reflects light making the black are look not quite black enough. so printers developed what they called a 4 color black. That is, when they want a large solid black ares, they print 100% black on top of 40% cyan/blue. This gets a richer black. As I describe it, the first ink, the blue presses down the paper fibers, and the they get hit with the black ink and never recover! so the blue circle could have been a case where the strippers cleaned out the circle from the black plate but forgot to get the blue plate done. Then they stripped out a white rectangle with the price in it. whats odder perhaps if how they handled the removal of the ten cents and the month July. They just stripped away the black July, as I’d expect, but used a white box to eliminate the 10C. Which is odd because both were surprinting on the artwork’s light blue dots! They should have used the same solution for each given that they had access to the same film they used to create the US cover printing. And another her thing I just noticed. Both editions have the IND distributor logo. Which is strange ... because IND distributes in the States, and Marvel used British distributor over the pond! Why leave the IND logo on these books?? Easy enough to,fix while fixing the price etc...
  10. OK I misread that blog post as "highest graded" but he said "finest known". so, what grade is the Salida 83 going to slab at? go downstairs and dig it out and check please! : )
  11. thats what I was looking for. Ive never used such a stamp, but figured they could exist. And having the choice of letters to use, (you know whats coming...) WHY choose the M? Somebody name? : ) Most of my Salidas have the big M stamp so thats MY pedigree marking for them... like the River Citys have grease pencil markings
  12. Good info. Thanx. Not to keep on with this though, the M is a store stamp, and I was expecting the answer for that to be a stamp made by a single store for their inventory. The M is always aligned with the date so must be a single stamp. Also, I didn’t realize that the highest grade OOAW 83 was a Salida copy! Thought it was a random copy in a collection.
  13. That’s what the stamp is for, to help retailer pull books to be returned 2 0r was it 3 months after being for sale on the racks. But the publication month on covers did the same thing. Always dared 2 or 3 months later than arrival/ship date. And no need to manually mark the distributor... the guy who dropped the comics off is same guy who picks up the returns each week. ‘I think the stamped M is part of the store stamp. Just wonder what it stands for.
  14. The distributor code on my book posted is the ID inside North America icon. Isn’t it?
  15. Maybe I wasn’t clear. I meant the M in the store stamp. A distributor code would have been printed like CC, or IND. the M is always stamped with the arrival date. And aside from the white pages or the earlier cookies stamp, when I see that distinctive M I’m thinking Salida!
  16. I’ve got a few Salidas... glad I pulled the trigger.
  17. Anyone know what the M in the stamp refers to? I’ve always wondered...
  18. Al "Capps" was the collector in question... beat me to it.... he was an "in-and-out whale" in the 90s. Got distracted by a new shiny bauble -- animation cells -- and traded "up" poorly. His comics would have been the better asset these past 25 years.
  19. good points. you see where Im going here. I don't recall any HG sales either. Which means that the owners are sitting around recalculating the values of their copies based on threads like this and no solid or public sales data. I know the feeling.... : ( Feels like the way we value these top books based on some sky high asking prices, and a few mega sales to ONE GUY (who is on the sidelines) plus a few other brave souls you can count on one hand, is say, tenuous? Or am I just in a crappy mood today?
  20. yeah. but I wonder where your "sounds about right, but possibly optimistic?" read on the 2M+ comic buying census fits into reality of the the nosebleed comics market. I often think we have a way more 2M+ valued books out there that are "worth it based on actual sales to date" than will ever sell at such prices. My math says it's down to only the razor thin slice of people WITH the liquid funds, that also desire to buy COMICS with it, and then, is THIS the BOOK they really want to park the money in. After each cut of the equation, the list is so small as to become a buyers market! with Caps elevated media presence since the movies, I agree that Cap#1 does now feel like its approaching Tec 27 and Action 1 territory, but we will only know the answer if and when it changes hands.
  21. I agree. but, in reality, worth 2M to whom? serious concern. Bedrock, Gator are you buying million dollar books these days? (absent a quick guaranteed flip to an specific customer?)
  22. Daisy Mae was hot... she's 103 and has no teeth now. but still looks OK in shorts and polkadots.
  23. I’ve seen long boxes of each of the 4 new marvel books from that month. Never could take them seriously after that.