GL/GA 76...grade me.

[gernblanston]

This is not mine, I was just curious what the board thinks about it. Assume the back cover is the same grade as the front.

 

[TheAvenger80]

I'd probably go 5.5 - 6.0 or so

[CAP Freak]

6.0 IMO

[CJ]

6.0 from me

[JohnT]

Miswrapped covers bother me, especially when this drastic. I'm not sure how much it affects the grade though. Other than that defect, I'd say 5.5.

[CAMPER49]

6.0 from me

[grandz-migration]

This is not mine, I was just curious what the board thinks about it. Assume the back cover is the same grade as the front.

 

You know what happens when you u me.

[divad]

This is not mine, I was just curious what the board thinks about it. Assume the back cover is the same grade as the front.

 

Not quite Fine, and certainly better than a VG . . . VG/FN 5.0

[rza808]

5.5/6.0 I lean towards 5.5

[mr.schomburg]

This is not mine, I was just curious what the board thinks about it. Assume the back cover is the same grade as the front.

 

Not quite Fine, and certainly better than a VG . . . VG/FN 5.0

 

Me Too!!! 5.0

[gernblanston]

I was thinking a 5.5.

[gernblanston]

There is someone trying to sell this book and they have it graded 9.0.....only 6 to 7 grades different from the board.

[bronzilla]

Respectable 5.5 could go a little higher.

[Point Five]

5.5 seems just right. I think the miswrap makes the spine scuffs even more glaring...I suspect we'd be saying 6.0/6.5 without it.

[bronzilla]

True.

[bronzilla]

If the price is right Gern buy it. It is a decent upper mid grade copy.

[gernblanston]

It is too miscut for my liking. But I have been looking for a reader copy, as well as a 9.2.

[bronzilla]

PM me if your interested. I have a double in vg- if I remember correctly.

[gernblanston]

(thumbs u

[gernblanston]

The only thing is the double cover is probably more valuable than I wanted to pick up. I am looking for a real reader where if you open the book up and put it on a scanner flat, no reduction in grade.