What should be labeled a "classic cover," but isn't by Overstreet or CGC?

[Joseph Ragno]

I recently started a thread that compiles a list of comic covers that Overstreet and/or CGC have labeled "classic." Here's a link to that thread:

http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2056566&page=1&fpart=1

 

Is there a comic cover that you think should be considered "classic," but is not on that list? Let your opinion be known, and who knows, your opinion may affect a future designation. A pic of the cover would be nice too! Thanks, --Joe

[FlyingDonut]

[chrisco37]

[DrWatson]

Giant Size X-men #1.

[chrisco37]

Giant Size X-men #1.

 

 

 

I think this may not appear as a classic cover b/c it is one of the uber-keys (just like AF #15).

[DrWatson]

I wouldn't disagree, but as many times as it has been ripped off, just like AF#15, I would consider it a classic. Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery.

[shiverbones]

worlds of fear #10

[shiverbones]

btw - on your list it should say black cat mystery 50, not 30.

[joeypost]

[joeypost]

[DrWatson]

Yes, very much so. (thumbs u

[DrWatson]

Not so much.

[joeypost]

No? Why?

[joeypost]

How about this one?

 

[chrisco37]

Not so much.

 

I agree. Never thought it was a great cover. Always preferred #49 to this one, but it's not what I'd call a classic cover.

 

Maybe Miller's Wolverine #1? Pretty classic image on that one.

 

[kagemusha7s]

[DrWatson]

No? Why?

I agree with what Chris posted. 49 would be a much better candidate since the cover features the reason that 48 is such a popular issue to begin with.

[kagemusha7s]

[kagemusha7s]

[Wrightson fan]