2007/2008 GRADING CONTEST: Round 3

[divad]

And we were 1) supposed to read this drivel? and 2) take it seriously, if we did?

 

Absent it's alleged Curator "status" that book wouldn't grade any higher than a 8.5

[Aces]

And we were 1) supposed to read this drivel? and 2) take it seriously, if we did?

 

Absent it's alleged Curator "status" that book wouldn't grade any higher than a 8.5

9.0 if it was a tomato boxer.

[Fan4Fan]

And we were 1) supposed to read this drivel? and 2) take it seriously, if we did?

 

Absent it's alleged Curator "status" that book wouldn't grade any higher than a 8.5

 

You're saying that what Nik said is "drivel"...

 

 

[VintageComics]

It would have been nice to know that the book was a Curator, and thus got the bogus pedigree bump . . .

 

 

i was going to vote 9.0, until i saw this on the first page...

 

"Nik, a few simple questions.

 

1) Who did you buy the book from? From a seller

2) How much did you pay? Not alot

3) Why? Its a Curator

4) Would you do it again? Probably

5) If yes, how many times? 1 million

6) If no, why not? DNA

7) Did you inhale?Right before I exhale

8) If yes, did the grade increase? Doubt it

9) If no, why not?Physics

10) If you did inhale, did the spine roll increase or decrease?DNA

 

Thanks for your time.My pleasure"

 

[evilsly]

I went with the double whammy of Ped bump and nik bump and overshot by .2

 

agree that without the curator designation it would be more likely to be in the 9.0 range

 

 

[divad]

And we were 1) supposed to read this drivel? and 2) take it seriously, if we did?

 

Absent it's alleged Curator "status" that book wouldn't grade any higher than a 8.5

9.0 if it was a tomato boxer.

Damn straight!