DAREDEVIL #1...GUESS THE GRADE (?) GRADE REVEALED

[-cryptkeeper-]

i'm agree with 4.0

[TheWatcher]

4.0

[trmoore54]

I always thought this book was graded a little harshly, but I hadn't looked at it for some time...thought that the chip out of the top right corner and the chipping at top edge due to slight overhang shouldn't have dropped the grade as much (splitting hairs to a certain degree)...but I realize now it's mostly due to the moisture/faint stain thing going on...it basically presents well in the FN range with the problems as mentioned...6.0 - 1.5 = 4.5

 

[silverage12c]

Given everyone's feedback, I would have to agree that it was graded accurately. Probably no benefit to re-subbing --- after all, there's no guarantee that it wouldn't come back lower!

 

I would love it if you called in for the grading notes and post them here. Would like to know how they characterize the damage/wear/discoloration at top.

[trmoore54]

Given everyone's feedback, I would have to agree that it was graded accurately. Probably no benefit to re-subbing --- after all, there's no guarantee that it wouldn't come back lower!

 

I would love it if you called in for the grading notes and post them here. Would like to know how they characterize the damage/wear/discoloration at top.

 

That's a good idea...I'll do that after Christmas and post them...

 

I'm not going to re-sub the book...I'm going to sell my DD 1-50 after the new year...

[rob_allan]

I think it's too nice for a 3.5. I'm going to guess 4.5.

 

Given my performance in Nik's contest so far I take this as proof that contest is rigged.

[BlowUpTheMoon]

4.5 'cause of the missing chip on the FC, upper right corner.