dover Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! What a great looking book! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebowski Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! Wow! I would love to own that. What a sweet, sweet book! Congrats! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiverbones Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! Wonderful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dover Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! Wonderful! the only thing that get's me is that I owned a raw 878, had it CGC'd (8.5) and then sold it when I thought I was getting out of the hobby... It is to this day the highest graded at 8.5!!!! I thought this had a chance at an 8.5. Still this is a pedigree, nicely cut and mine!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebowski Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) It's also mislabeled! "Dale Hale story, cover, and art" Shouldn't Schulz be credited with the cover? Edited April 24, 2009 by Lebowski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dover Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) It's also mislabeled! "Dale Hale story, cover, and art" Shouldn't Schulz be credited with the cover? hmmm...Overstreet says Schultz cover only...I am not sending it back! Also, I just looked at the 8.5 scan and it says Schults cover. I am still not sending it back. Edited April 24, 2009 by Dover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebowski Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 It's also mislabeled! "Dale Hale story, cover, and art" Shouldn't Schulz be credited with the cover? hmmm...Overstreet says Schultz cover only...I am not sending it back! Also, I just looked at the 8.5 scan and it says Schults cover. I am still not sending it back. Oh, I hear ya. Re-holdering is a nice little waiting game that ain't fun to play. Hence why my Animal Man #5 will permanently say "1981" on the label instead of "1989." (thumbs u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloudofwit Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 sitting on my desk when I got to work!!! Three cheers for the old school TV. Very nice book. Bethlehem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BradleyX2 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 It's also mislabeled! "Dale Hale story, cover, and art" Shouldn't Schulz be credited with the cover? No mislabel. Charles Schulz never did any PEANUTS work for comic books. Despite having his name on them, they were all done (stories & art) by Dale Hale. Same thing with Batman/Detective comics from the 50'5 & 60's being "signed" by Bob Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dover Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 It's also mislabeled! "Dale Hale story, cover, and art" Shouldn't Schulz be credited with the cover? No mislabel. Charles Schulz never did any PEANUTS work for comic books. Despite having his name on them, they were all done (stories & art) by Dale Hale. Same thing with Batman/Detective comics from the 50'5 & 60's being "signed" by Bob Kane. and know we know! Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebowski Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 ...and knowing is half the battle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canickus Posted April 26, 2009 Share Posted April 26, 2009 I received some really nice books back from last submission. This was not one of them... To add punishment to stupidity, the piece of packaging material towards the middle bottom is safely encapsulated with this book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LloydJBailey Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 That's so harsh! I feel bad for you man, . I guess you gotta see the humorous side to it though! I received some really nice books back from last submission. This was not one of them... To add punishment to stupidity, the piece of packaging material towards the middle bottom is safely encapsulated with this book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KryptoSpidey Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) I received some really nice books back from last submission. This was not one of them... To add punishment to stupidity, the piece of packaging material towards the middle bottom is safely encapsulated with this book. 8.0?? what did the cgc notes say?..am i missing something here? first glance looked like the skull was smoking a fatty and batman was reaching for it.... Edited April 27, 2009 by kryptospidey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
con Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Been a floater on the site and just now figured how to post pics [/img] [/img] [/img] [/img] [/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chespirito Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 That Bargirl pose is awesome! The lIzzard monster, not as cool..but man..she looks good,..If I were a cartoon, I'd be all over that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_Henn Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Recent moderns (and bronze) back this week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeachBum Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 (edited) [/img] I remember this cover... It was one of the first comics I ever had. I was like 6 years old. Edited April 27, 2009 by BeachBum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canickus Posted April 27, 2009 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I received some really nice books back from last submission. This was not one of them... To add punishment to stupidity, the piece of packaging material towards the middle bottom is safely encapsulated with this book. 8.0?? what did the cgc notes say?..am i missing something here? first glance looked like the skull was smoking a fatty and batman was reaching for it.... The packaging material had nothing to do with the grade. Just poor QC on CGCs part. The grade had everything to do with the poor QC on my part...I sent the wrong book in. No need for graders notes, the back scan should suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
