PGM Detective 296

[JerryZ]

Nice copy of Detective #296..has a printers defect on the cover looks like a scratch but its a small fold like flaw thats a printer issue.. pretty book ,nice gloss Bottom left corner has a slight ding,minute dust shadow and bc as well..

 

Opinions?

 

 

[Old Fashion PB and J]

[john72tex]

This isn't the sales thread.

 

I'd probably give it a 8.0.

[Monstro]

8.0

[Boozad]

8.0. Ignore Pat, it's his turn at the head of the train today.

[Earl Davis]

8.0

[rjpb]

6.5

[Limited66]

7.5

[TFL-migration]

7.0 IMHO The lite dust shadow is what brings the grade down just a bit. IMHO Nice book..

[gaz2810i]

7.5

[JerryZ]

WOW!! Rough crowd

 

6.5???

[The Silver-Age]

8.5

[Old Fashion PB and J]

The books most likely an 8.0/8.5

 

The reason I say this is my last submission was full of "test" subjects to get a feel for CGC grading on specific defects. Dust shadows being at the head. The scanner will darken a dust shadow, but still show the amount of area affected. This is why I say 8.0 as my first choice for grade.

 

And I will take it if you wanna move it. But I think I just bought the Northland copy of this book as well. But this one may look better in my collection.

 

 

Pat-

[Boozad]

I repeat...

 

8.0. Ignore Pat, it's his turn at the head of the train today.

 

 

[JerryZ]

PAT Boozad

 

[Boozad]

Toot toot Pat!

[Old Fashion PB and J]

Toot toot Pat!

Horrible, just horrible..

 

And back off the Tecs or I will start buying Batmans again.

[Boozad]

Toot toot Pat!

Horrible, just horrible..

 

And back off the Tecs or I will start buying Batmans again.

 

Go for the #297 Don Rosa first...

[mrlatko]

7.5 with the dust shadow, 8.0 or 8.5 without.

[Old Fashion PB and J]

8.0