• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The 2010 Nik Memorial Grading Contest *Round 16*

Started by DrWatson,

88 posts in this topic

flatrock02

flatrock02

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see a flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Me too, thought they were throwing a curveball at us :censored:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KryptoSpidey

KryptoSpidey

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Almost did the same exact thing.

The thought actually crossed my mind. Thank god I come to my senses. census

Fixed that for ya... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
comicdonna

comicdonna

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Almost did the same exact thing.

The thought actually crossed my mind. Thank god I come to my senses. census

Fixed that for ya... lol

lol No, I don't use the census. My results from a few rounds will prove that. :grin:
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlowUpTheMoon

BlowUpTheMoon

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Almost did the same exact thing.

The thought actually crossed my mind. Thank god I come to my senses. census

Fixed that for ya... lol

 

Well done. :golfclap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trmoore54

trmoore54

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see a flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Passed ya! :baiting:

 

At least for now...

 

As previously mentioned, went with the probabalistic outcome here which had to be 9.8...I haven't submitted many 9.8s but the one's I have, and/or still own, are virtually flawless and certainly worthy of 9.9 consideration if not perhaps 10.0 on rare occasion. But I have never gotten a 9.9...flawless books as a rule get graded 9.8... 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites
inconceivable

inconceivable

Posted
Posted
Curses - 9.8 was the obvious answer, but I honestly couldn't see a flaw, and there were no disclosed 'invisible on the scan flaws' so I took a punt on 9.9 in the hope of catching up a couple of points on the leaders.

 

That'll learn me. :tonofbricks:

 

Passed ya! :baiting:

 

At least for now...

 

As previously mentioned, went with the probabalistic outcome here which had to be 9.8...I haven't submitted many 9.8s but the one's I have, and/or still own, are virtually flawless and certainly worthy of 9.9 consideration if not perhaps 10.0 on rare occasion. But I have never gotten a 9.9...flawless books as a rule get graded 9.8... 2c

 

Nik told me once that he was still waiting for the elusive 9.9. That is why I couldn't pick 9.9 (even if it was).

 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing