The X-Men #1 1963

[Phreak-migration]

Whatcha think?

 

 

the color is more like this one, for some reason my full spectrum desk bulb and the camera make it look whiter

 

 

Thanks!

[mysterio]

1.5, maybe a 1.8.

 

[ROBTOTHEC]

I think that's a 2.0 with a shot at a 2.5.

[KEY ISSUES Comics]

Ya forgot to include 1.8 as an option. (thumbs u

 

I'd give it a 2.0.

[tortoise]

1.8 - 2.0 voted 2.0

[Phreak-migration]

never graded comics , trying to get a feel for what its worth. I just had The X-Men #1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,​14,15,16,18,20,22,23,24 stuck on my desk and i said "ooooooo"

[KEY ISSUES Comics]

Let us help you un"stuck" them then. Put 'em up for sale here!!!

[marvelcollector]

I voted 2.0, but could see 2.5...

[Phreak-migration]

Let us help you un"stuck" them then. Put 'em up for sale here!!!

 

might have to do that, just wish i knew how to grade n price them, btw i got that daredevil #1 in your pics. My step dad has been hording an amazing collection

[Lethal_Collector]

I said 3.0, but i don't know how CGC would handle the staples on this...

 

 

Jerome

[oakman29]

2.0

[AK Comics]

I had an FF 1 with a rougher spine and it got a 2.5. So I'd say 2.5

[NYNick]

2.0

[ARK]

1.8/2.0

[Hibou]

I'll say 2.0 as well...

[AGGIEZ]

Sell it to me!

[Spiderphill]

Will it still be a blue label with replaced staples? Look replaced to me but I could be wrong. Anyhow 2.0 is my guess no huge chunks missing.

[oakman29]

Will it still be a blue label with replaced staples?

No

[Dark Knight]

2.0

[Conan_Aficionado]

I'm a follower, not a leader. 2.0