Couple HG Avengers, now 10% off!!!

[sufunk]

Ok, i gotta try and unload a few more of my under copies that ive upgraded.

 

Same rules as always, no probies, no HOSers. Shipping will be exact and will do international.

 

Payment can be PP,check or MO (thumbs u

[sufunk]

Avengers 88 9.2w

 

$65

 

 

(scanner has been crapping out on me lately, if you want better scane or a BC scan, i can get them tonight for you but there are no BC issues with any of these)

 

 

[Ramses717]

Avengers 88 9.2w

 

$65

 

 

9.6

[sufunk]

Avengers 88 9.2w

 

$65

 

 

9.6

 

 

Oops, hit the wrong scan

[sufunk]

Avengers 92 9.8ow/w

 

$1400

 

[sufunk]

Avengers 118 9.4w

 

$164

 

[PsychoJ]

Brilliant Avengers books as always Jason

[PsychoJ]

That Neal Adams cover #92 is awesome

[Mark 1]

Avengers 92 9.8ow/w

 

$1400

 

 

This is an under copy?

[trmoore54]

Avengers 92 9.8ow/w

 

$1400

 

 

This is an under copy?

 

That's what I was thinking...

[namisgr]

I suspect Jason now owns a pedigree copy.

[sufunk]

I suspect Jason now owns a pedigree copy.

 

 

 

[sufunk]

[PsychoJ]

Just as an interested HG Avengers collector what are the major differences between the ped and non ped book Jason. The non ped seems to have a slightly better cut along the spine but the peds colours are just so much more rich and deeper. Am I right at all from the scans?

[PsychoJ]

Both books are screaming though and the non ped really gives its ped brother some serious competition

[Gotham Kid]

I suspect Jason now owns a pedigree copy.

 

 

 

 

Pretty sure if this copy gets a new holder, the mis-cut note won't be included ... just saying

 

Awesome WP copy Jason

[sufunk]

Just as an interested HG Avengers collector what are the major differences between the ped and non ped book Jason. The non ped seems to have a slightly better cut along the spine but the peds colours are just so much more rich and deeper. Am I right at all from the scans?

 

Those 2 92's are pretty equal in hand. The Ped has a worse angled miscut but is a little bit more glossy in hand. The non Ped is nice as hell! If I hadn't started the Pedigree run that would have been my keeper forever! If it was a cheaper book, say only a couple hundred dollars, I'd definitely keep them both. As expensive as it is though, I'd rather try to sell it to get more Peds.

 

And Peter is definitely right IMO. If the Ped was re holdered, no way would the miscut note be on there. I think CGC was desperate to have anything on the label back then

[Hank Pym]

Pretty sure if this copy gets a new holder, the mis-cut note won't be included ... just saying

+1

GLWTS Jason. Both 92's are great, and whoever picks up the non-Ped will get a really sweet looking book! (thumbs u

[sufunk]

[sufunk]

 

 

Ok, one last bump and then off to Clink so before i do that, i'll offer you guys the same 10% they would take.

 

Soooo, 10% off any of the 3 books for you guys!