WOW

[Bfairb]

http://www.comiclink.com/itemdetail.asp?back=%2FNewItems%2Easp%3FType%3D%26x%3D9%26y%3D3%26pg%3D15&id=1021336

[Mark 1]

Wasn't this part of the Schmell collection at one time?

 

 

[1904 Comics]

doomit

[zosocane]

[Gotham Kid]

previous 9.4 that has been finally upgraded to 9.6 (after countless press/resubs I'm sure)

[Gotham Kid]

Wasn't this part of the Schmell collection at one time?

 

 

yes

 

 

[wasteddraftpicks]

Look at that corner. Should that even be a 9.6? Maybe I am too harsh. buy the book, not the grade!!

[Gotham Kid]

Even though it now sits in a 9.6 holder, book is still a 9.4.

[budsbundy]

Not a fan of that crooked wrap

[999ghosts]

And I was hoping this would be a "Women of Wrestling" thread.

Those titles are puzzling sometimes...

[HighStakesComics]

Even though it now sits in a 9.6 holder, book is still a 9.4.

 

9.4 might be generous. I'm not sure how it looked pre-sub, but as it sits without seeing back cover 9.2 seems reasonable. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to own it!

[Gotham Kid]

And I was hoping this would be a "Women of Wrestling" thread.

 

[Columbia Comics]

And I was hoping this would be a "Women of Wrestling" thread.

 

I'm more of a fan of GLOW

[mschmidt]

Even though it now sits in a 9.6 holder, book is still a 9.4.

 

9.4 might be generous. I'm not sure how it looked pre-sub, but as it sits without seeing back cover 9.2 seems reasonable. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to own it!

 

Calling that book a 9.2 is ridiculous - I get that undergrading on purpose is supposedly the cool thing to do, but, jeez.

[Spiderphill]

Books like this always make me question CGCs integrity. Like come on, it has 2 sharp corners and I can't tell if the upper right has a faint corner bend or not.

[HighStakesComics]

Even though it now sits in a 9.6 holder, book is still a 9.4.

 

9.4 might be generous. I'm not sure how it looked pre-sub, but as it sits without seeing back cover 9.2 seems reasonable. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to own it!

 

Calling that book a 9.2 is ridiculous - I get that undergrading on purpose is supposedly the cool thing to do, but, jeez.

 

Not as ridiculous as calling it a 9.6. Especially with the wear around both staples and both corners along the spine.

[Columbia Comics]

It's a 9.4. Probably shouldn't be in a 9.6 holder but kudos to whomever took that risk.

 

The top corner is sharp and I think that's a page (or microchamber paper) peeking out.

 

One think you have to keep in mind...even 9.8s have flaws or they'd be 10.0s. While I'm not sold its a 9.6 w/out looking at the book in hand, based on what I see, its a solid 9.4.

[Mr.Diggler]

previous 9.4 that has been finally upgraded to 9.6 (after countless press/resubs I'm sure)

[HighStakesComics]

It's a 9.4. Probably shouldn't be in a 9.6 holder but kudos to whomever took that risk.

 

The top corner is sharp and I think that's a page (or microchamber paper) peeking out.

 

One think you have to keep in mind...even 9.8s have flaws or they'd be 10.0s. While I'm not sold its a 9.6 w/out looking at the book in hand, based on what I see, its a solid 9.4.

 

Funny thing about it is it actually looks 9.6 back in the pic with the 9.4 holder. It looks like its been handled a bit since then.

[MagnetoWasRight]

I see a solid 9.4, possible 9.6...either way its an epic piece of history. I'd love to own a 3.0-4.0 eventually so we aren't even in the same neighborhood.