RESULTS: CGC Green Eggs Grading Contest Round 1

[sckao]

 

2014 CGC Green Eggs Grading Contest Results for ROUND 1

 

 

BOOK 1: Archie 50 (Actual Grade: 3.5)

 

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/361217/Archie50_FC.jpg

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/361217/Archie50_BC.jpg

 

BOOK 2: The Ghost of Kareema-Lou (Actual Grade: 9.6)

 

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/361217/KareemaLou_FC.jpg

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/361217/KareemaLou_BC.jpg

[sckao]

 

RANKING FOR ROUND 1

[sckao]

 

Individual Achievements as of Round 1

[Point Five]

Thanks as always, Shin. These stats are such fun.

 

Congrats to the double bullseye gang!

 

 

[thirdgreenham]

Welp, I was wrong. There were 5 double bullseyes! Nice!!

 

Tough books to open up a tough contest.

[sckao]

Trying something a little different... Using the File Manager to hold the Images so they remain with the Board...

 

Achievements look a little off... Will be updated later.

[sckao]

Little rusty this first time... It'll be shorter for Future Rounds! (Edits will be made to the files above later...)

 

 

[Gsims718]

Man I went way too low on that archie. I always prefer under grading Atleast.

[toro]

Okay who gave book 2 a 5.5 I need to know so I can buy all of their 5.5s and 6.0 raw books from them.

 

 

 

[jessebrook1]

I had the Archie at 2.5 and The Ghost of Kareeq-lou at 9.6

[RockMyAmadeus]

Welp, I was wrong. There were 5 double bullseyes! Nice!!

 

Tough books to open up a tough contest.

 

It's fun watching.

[Lazyboy]

Tied with the guys who didn't submit guesses!

[sckao]

 

Place by Round

 

[SuperiorSpiderMan]

Thanks for your hard work on the charts. Greatly appreciated! (thumbs u

 

I flubbed Book 2 but the front and back spine was not setting well with me.

 

 

 

[stanley1883]

I had the Archie at 2.5 and The Ghost of Kareeq-lou at 9.6

 

 

I went the other direction with Archie 4.5. Same on the 9.6

[A.Romeo]

I just dont understand how that book is a 9.6

[telerites]

Goodness I was way too harsh

[CAMPER49]

Thanks for your hard work on the charts. Greatly appreciated! (thumbs u

 

I flubbed Book 2 but the front and back spine was not setting well with me.

 

 

 

Yeah I thought the same about Book 2. That spine looks awful (I mean on the book itself, not on the guy in the glasses flicking a booger from the cover art).

[cheetah]

I just dont understand how that book is a 9.6

 

It is a 9.6 only when compared to the 9.4 from a previous contest.

[thirdgreenham]

The "flaking" on the spine was production. I had 3 copies of that book and submitted the nicest one. They all had that same issue.