PGM: DD #1 Rescanned!

[Malcontent]

Here are new scans if my DD #1. as I had said in a previous post, I see a bit of a difference here on how the scan looks compared to the actual item.

[Sensei Ryan]

5.0 VG/FN (maybe higher with a press depending on the type of waviness damage that the book has) - a beaut all around, though!

[Sensei Ryan]

PS - Awesome book! Congrats!!!

[Philreal]

5.5/6.0 IMO. Especially with a press(if you're into that ).

[Mmanick]

5.0 if you wanna compare here is my copy

[Waylander]

What is on the BLBC and does it come through to the BRFC?

[ROBTOTHEC]

So this scan looks possibly overexposed as compared to the

other one. Did you cahange settings?

That being said, you say no moisture damage?

I don't see where the 4.0's are coming from. I would be ecstatic if I got

4.0's that looked like this book. Sure looks 5.5/6.0 to me!!! IMHO...

[Aasparky1000]

5.0 to 5.5 w/ a press better

[rodan57]

So this scan looks possibly overexposed as compared to the

other one. Did you cahange settings?

That being said, you say no moisture damage?

I don't see where the 4.0's are coming from. I would be ecstatic if I got

4.0's that looked like this book. Sure looks 5.5/6.0 to me!!! IMHO...

[Dick Pontoon]

The wrinkling between the staples on both the front and back and corner stains look like moisture damage to me. And if that close-up of the splash page was made by placing the book with the cover open on a scan bed, the OP probably took at least half a point off the grade.

[Warren Oates]

eh 6ish

 

that light spot on the back cover seems weird, but i've seen lots of books with tose.