• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DEATHLOK vs. AREXCROOKE : Double OT

Started by nik,

24 posts in this topic

arexcrooke

arexcrooke

Posted
Posted
Now that's more like it... 893applaud-thumb.giffrustrated.gif

 

Jim

 

yup - thanks for moving ot along guys......... thumbsup2.gif

 

Oops, im more than a little embarrased on that one.

I guess the back cover had some stuff in it that I didnt catch.

Nikos,

what are the grading notes on this one?

Im so embarrased

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Norrin_Radd

Norrin_Radd

Posted
Posted
"Okay its over, we have a winner.

 

deathlok 8.5 - arexcrooke 9.4"

 

 

9.4???

I believe that is what is called "over compensating"

It was a tough book to figure...Nice try in playing the odds, though.

 

He just used a little too much of the "Nikos factor." tonofbricks.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jayman

Jayman

Posted
Posted

That was brutal, really nice front but terrible back! In this case the dirt on the back served to highlight all the bends and creases that would not necessarily be seen on a scan with a clean BC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
burntboy

burntboy

Posted
Posted
That was brutal, really nice front but terrible back! In this case the dirt on the back served to highlight all the bends and creases that would not necessarily be seen on a scan with a clean BC.

 

i think that sums it up nicely........ thumbsup2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darthdiesel

Darthdiesel

Posted
Posted
That was brutal, really nice front but terrible back! In this case the dirt on the back served to highlight all the bends and creases that would not necessarily be seen on a scan with a clean BC.

 

i think that sums it up nicely........ thumbsup2.gif

 

Thank God for that 7.5 .... I was beginning to think that all of nikos' books were structurally sound but had been dragged thru the muck and mire at one point in their lifetimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deathlok

deathlok

Posted
Posted
"Okay its over, we have a winner.

 

deathlok 8.5 - arexcrooke 9.4"

 

 

9.4???

I believe that is what is called "over compensating"

It was a tough book to figure...Nice try in playing the odds, though.

 

He just used a little too much of the "Nikos factor." tonofbricks.gif

 

I had thought it was a 7.0/7.5 but the "Nikos Factor" really throws me. So I add a couple grades and hoped for the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing