So, MARVEL may have a P.R. Nightmare on they're hands.

[awakeintheashes]

I'd take Charles Johnson's claims with a grain of salt or at least an innumerable amount of caution before jumping to any conclusions...There may be some truth to his claim, but nothing as major as he is trumpeting

 

Is Charles Johnson a Digital Darth Vader?

 

Troll Charles Johnson banned from Twitter

 

Sowing Mayhem, One Click at a Time

 

 

[chewy106]

Article is over a month old and the rumor source was voted by Gawker of all places as the web's "worst journalist." Even if there was some truth to it, it seems like Chuck is sensationalizing again, as this was right after the Avengers movie release.

[makeminemego]

Sensationalism at its finest. If this guy has anything on him, he's probably overplaying his hand.

 

I wouldn't get too excited.

 

Chances are, the whole thing turns into Geraldo in Jimmy Hoffa's vault.

[Jimmy Linguini]

I hate how the outhouse and the Mary sue have come out of nowhere in the last two years to push political agendas in the comic book world.

 

I just don't care.

[marvelcollector]

I'm not seeing how the actions of an individual - before he joined the company - could possibly taint a brand to the point of being disastrous. Or invoking a yawn.

 

Some reporters just get delusional about the importance of the stories they uncover.

[paperheart]

Pretty sure Perlmutter is Disney's biggest individual shareholder (or one of) after the buy-out of Marvel. So forcing him out no matter how awful it is (short of there being some sort of clause for immoral or illegal behavior & charges or something as part of that contract) might be a nightmare.

What I'd LOVE to know is how bad is it that it would hurt Marvel's brand.

 

Perlmutter already tried to destroy Spider-Man by interfering with Raimi on SM3. How could this be any worse?

[DEATHLOK9147]

iIlluminati confirmed??

[mob_medina7]

@DEATHLOK9147" iIlluminati confirmed?? "

bro that is the exact reason this whole mess will be swept under the rug.disneys got connections yo!

[Doktor]

Pretty sure Perlmutter is Disney's biggest individual shareholder (or one of) after the buy-out of Marvel. So forcing him out no matter how awful it is (short of there being some sort of clause for immoral or illegal behavior & charges or something as part of that contract) might be a nightmare.

What I'd LOVE to know is how bad is it that it would hurt Marvel's brand.

 

Perlmutter already tried to destroy Spider-Man by interfering with Raimi on SM3. How could this be any worse?

 

Thought that was the Sony execs that kinda forced Raimi to smash 2 movies together because they wanted him to do Venom & he wanted to do Sandman?

[Aman619]

Ike was in hot water over lawsuits brought by women a few years ago.

 

http://deadline.com/2012/08/disney-and-marvel-do-damage-control-ike-perlmutter-from-media-attacks-320837/

[paperheart]

Pretty sure Perlmutter is Disney's biggest individual shareholder (or one of) after the buy-out of Marvel. So forcing him out no matter how awful it is (short of there being some sort of clause for immoral or illegal behavior & charges or something as part of that contract) might be a nightmare.

What I'd LOVE to know is how bad is it that it would hurt Marvel's brand.

 

Perlmutter already tried to destroy Spider-Man by interfering with Raimi on SM3. How could this be any worse?

 

Thought that was the Sony execs that kinda forced Raimi to smash 2 movies together because they wanted him to do Venom & he wanted to do Sandman?

 

my bad. wrong billionaire.

Remember when Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 4 was a go, and then Raimi, after the epic clusterf**k (sic, not masking here) that was Spider-Man 3, threw up his hands and said, "Forget this; I'm out," and then we learned that it was all Avi Arad's fault, basically?

[Doktor]

Pretty sure Perlmutter is Disney's biggest individual shareholder (or one of) after the buy-out of Marvel. So forcing him out no matter how awful it is (short of there being some sort of clause for immoral or illegal behavior & charges or something as part of that contract) might be a nightmare.

What I'd LOVE to know is how bad is it that it would hurt Marvel's brand.

 

Perlmutter already tried to destroy Spider-Man by interfering with Raimi on SM3. How could this be any worse?

 

Thought that was the Sony execs that kinda forced Raimi to smash 2 movies together because they wanted him to do Venom & he wanted to do Sandman?

 

my bad. wrong billionaire.

Remember when Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 4 was a go, and then Raimi, after the epic clusterf**k (sic, not masking here) that was Spider-Man 3, threw up his hands and said, "Forget this; I'm out," and then we learned that it was all Avi Arad's fault, basically?

Lots of things were Avi Arad's fault. That's why Marvel canned him (in fairness, they only did so after he helped steer the ship with Ike through some really nasty waters & keep the boat from sinking a few times & making everyone a LOT of money)

[The Black Hand ®]

Disney\MarvelTHIS BOARD has way too many attorneys.

 

fixed

My wife is a paralegal for a group attorneys,and she says they are the most unorganized,talk out their azzes,BSers you would ever know.If it wasn't for the paralegals doing all the work they wouldn't know their azzes from a hole in the wall.

 

Nurses say the same thing about doctors.