General discussion thread - keep the other threads clean 29 29

[Jeffro.]

I'm waiting for my junk to arrive

 

You haven't lived until someone has lowballed your junk

[entalmighty1]

I'm waiting for my junk to arrive

 

You haven't lived until someone has lowballed your junk

 

[MetalPSI]

So....that's why JD offered me a mustache....

 

I thought he was just coming on to me...

[porcupine48]

Can we get back to the Wilson Phillips discussion ?

I think Junkdrawer and Swick have to finish a serving of crow first.

What about the Fox...sneaky old Fox got away...

[porcupine48]

I'm not a fan of piling on, but I saw Swick and Junkdrawer in the closet making babies and I saw one of the babies and then the baby looked at me.

Classic.

[porcupine48]

I had a list, but it's in my pants

Mines in the back of.....

I heart you!

[porcupine48]

The one thing I've learned is not to refer to my books as "junk"

Have you resent that junk yet?!

PS i heart you.

[porcupine48]

That's it... I am going to make a list.

Can I be on it!?! ill send you LEGO...the cool spider i showed you...

[NewWorldOrder]

Just in case anyone was wondering I PMed arch to ask if posting PMs are allowed.

 

Here is his response:

 

"Hi,

 

No, moderation policy does not insist that private messages are not re-posted. If you send something to someone, you are entrusting them with that content. "

 

Arch

Edited August 7, 2015 by SPECTRE_nWo

[Ryan.]

Arch negatived the meaning right out of that first sentence.

[thirdgreenham]

Just in case anyone was wondering I PMed arch to ask if posting PMs are allowed.

 

Here is his response:

 

"Hi,

 

No, moderation policy does not insist that private messages are not re-posted. If you send something to someone, you are entrusting them with that content. "

 

Arch

 

Post your exact question to him, please.

 

[VintageComics]

That's Arch's way of removing CGC from liability if someone does post PMs.

 

In my opinion it's bad form to publicly post PMs without the consent of the other person.

 

And if it's in the case of a dispute, at the very least you'd want to have a proper discussion with the other person in an attempt to settle the dispute before resorting to posting PMs as evidence.

 

That's just my

 

 

[Ryan.]

That's Arch's way of removing CGC from liability if someone does post PMs.

 

That's how I read it as well. I wonder if Arch has a legal background of some sort. The construction of his response looks very familiar.

[VintageComics]

That's Arch's way of removing CGC from liability if someone does post PMs.

 

That's how I read it as well. I wonder if Arch has a legal background of some sort. The construction of his response looks very familiar.

 

Or the collectibles group is large enough that they might run stuff by their legal department.

 

But yeah, definitely legalese.

[wombat]

Just in case anyone was wondering I PMed arch to ask if posting PMs are allowed.

 

Here is his response:

 

"Hi,

 

No, moderation policy does not insist that private messages are not re-posted. If you send something to someone, you are entrusting them with that content. "

 

Arch

 

I read that as it's OK to post PMs from a moderation perspective. And be careful who you trust.

[CAHokie]

That's Arch's way of removing CGC from liability if someone does post PMs.

 

That's how I read it as well. I wonder if Arch has a legal background of some sort. The construction of his response looks very familiar.

 

 

Wait, are you saying Arch is actually Comix4fun???

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1Cool]

Just for future reference - If you call someone a liar and untrustworthy and it turns out to not be true would that be liable? Just curious if I understand the definition correctly.

[Ryan.]

That's Arch's way of removing CGC from liability if someone does post PMs.

 

That's how I read it as well. I wonder if Arch has a legal background of some sort. The construction of his response looks very familiar.

 

 

Wait, are you saying Arch is actually Comix4fun???

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HarveySwick.

[EC ed]

Just for future reference - If you call someone a liar and untrustworthy and it turns out to not be true would that be liable? Just curious if I understand the definition correctly.

 

If it's spoken, it's slander. If it's written, it's libel.

 

Technically (I think), in either case, part of the definition also involves some actual damage being done, otherwise it's just

[VintageComics]

I read that as it's OK to post PMs from a moderation perspective. And be careful who you trust.

 

I think general, people should think about saying or putting something into writing before doing it. Generally, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.