Raw Sensation 1 on the bay... real? 0

[jabats]

Raw Sensation 1 on the bay... real?

Sort of an odd listing... just 1 photo... zero feedback seller... 

several bids though (could be shill?)

can anyone tell from the photo if it's a reprint?

[Action252Kid]

Just eyeballing it, it looks like the wrong size.  And no "!" after "Wonder Woman", which I believe differentiates the Famous First Edition (which is what this probably is) and the original.

[jabats]

3 minutes ago, Action252Kid said:

Just eyeballing it, it looks like the wrong size.  And no "!" after "Wonder Woman", which I believe differentiates the Famous First Edition (which is what this probably is) and the original.

I figured ... the bids threw me off though.

thank you :-)

[G.A.tor]

42 minutes ago, Action252Kid said:

Just eyeballing it, it looks like the wrong size.  And no "!" after "Wonder Woman", which I believe differentiates the Famous First Edition (which is what this probably is) and the original.

I sent his info to the seller earlier his morning 

the "!" Is fc tell tale. 

[jabats]

Thanks very much guys!

[rjpb]

Always seems legit when a zero feedback seller isn't consistent with  where they found something. In an old friend's garage or his mother-in-law's garage? 

[G.A.tor]

 They responded back to me thank you for the information it was a reprint, but I'm not sure if they've adjusted the description or not 

[rjpb]

On 6/5/2017 at 6:57 AM, G.A.tor said:

I sent his info to the seller earlier his morning 

the "!" Is fc tell tale. 

Also the Daisy Manufacturing address banner is missing from the bottom of the back cover. 

[G.A.tor]

12 minutes ago, rjpb said:

Also the Daisy Manufacturing address banner is missing from the bottom of the back cover. 

Correct. The fc tell tale is the "!" And the bc you got

[rjpb]

3 minutes ago, G.A.tor said:

Correct. The fc tell tale is the "!" And the bc you got

I only brought it up because theoretically the exclamation point could have fully faded as it has no outline. The other reds still show a little orange, so highly unlikely.  I reported it to ebay, because it doesn't look like a mistake out of ignorance. 

Edited June 6, 2017 by rjpb

[G.A.tor]

5 hours ago, rjpb said:

I only brought it up because theoretically the exclamation point could have fully faded as it has no outline. The other reds still show a little orange, so highly unlikely.  I reported it to ebay, because it doesn't look like a mistake out of ignorance. 

Correct. Virtually no chance it would completely fade away. Easy to spot as a ffe 

[path4play]

11 hours ago, G.A.tor said:

Correct. Virtually no chance it would completely fade away. Easy to spot as a ffe 

In seller's defense he has added comment "I'm being told this is a reprint from 1971."  Hasn't stopped bidders from running up to $3K+.  Feeling kinda bad for all parties.

[Chicago Boy]

The last pic he has is my crappy old 3.0 universal copy. Not sure why he has it or where he got it. I know Metropolis had it once but kept in the holder. I didn't see where he mentioned reprint lately.  Must have missed it. 

[path4play]

21 minutes ago, Chicago Boy said:

The last pic he has is my crappy old 3.0 universal copy. Not sure why he has it or where he got it. I know Metropolis had it once but kept in the holder. I didn't see where he mentioned reprint lately.  Must have missed it. 

Just above Q&A.  I think he recently added pics out of the frame and added new comments

Edited June 7, 2017 by path4play

[G.A.tor]

3 staples also a confirmation it is the FFE reprint