• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Hereditary
0

11 posts in this topic

Generally enjoyed it, particularly the first 80% of the film, but wow, it sure does change fast during the final act by transitioning very quickly from reality-based horror to the purely supernatural.  It's easy to see how many people could enjoy the first two-thirds but absolutely hate the final part...it's like two entirely different movies jammed into a single one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got one major question about that ending.  I'll put it in a spoiler tag since we're within a month of the film's release.

Spoiler

Why did they dig the grandmother up, why did they behead her, why did they have Annie behead herself, why did they put Charlie's head on the effigy, and why were their headless bodies placed in a kneeling position?  Was it all to just put everything totally over the top, ramping up at an exponential pace from realistic horror to purely supernatural horror?  The reaction in my theater was that there was a boisterous round of snickering laughter when it ended, and I found the whole thing amusing too because it was so exaggeratedly extreme compared to the rest of the film.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rip said:

I need to see this but I've heard it has one of those crazy WTF endings. It got a D+ cinemascore

That's a weird score.  I totally get it because the ending stands out like a sore thumb from the rest of the film, but the critical reviews were REALLY good because the first 80% of the movie is absolutely scintillating.  And it's going to be surprising if Toni Collette doesn't get a best actress nomination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing--isn't the title of the movie DIRECTLY misleading?  Here's what I mean:

Spoiler

For most of the film you're thinking that Toni Collette, her brother who committed suicide, her daughter, and her son have varying flavors of mental disorders that are likely genetically inherited.  But by the end we realize that's probably not it at all, that her brother committed suicide because her mother was trying to get him possessed by that demon, the daughter WAS possessed by the demon, and Collette's character had to live around all of that and her cultish mom her entire life.  So there's nothing really hereditary at all about what's going on, is there?  It all stems from the grandmother being an evil SOB who screws up everyone's lives not via genetic inheritance but through her desire to find a mortal vessel for the demon she's obsessed with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question about something I can't remember about the sequence of events that I just realized is important as to the film's intent about whether events happen realistically or supernaturally:

Spoiler

At some point there's a scene I vividly recall where they show the symbol of Paimon on that telephone pole that Charlie loses her head to.  Do they show that before or after the accident?  If it's before, then that indicates supernatural influence causing the accident and her death.  If it's after, that could have just been the human cult members marking the scene as significant after they find out it happens.

I think we see that symbol before that huge event, but I don't entirely remember.

Edited by fantastic_four
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My son saw this recently with a bunch of friends and they said they couldn't stop laughing during the last 20 min. He said the build up was decent, but a bit slow.  

They said it was a great "bad" movie, the perfect MST3K movie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0