7th Annual Green Eggs Grading Contest - Round 2 Results (2 of 10) 0

[Kon_Jelly]

I thought CGC was harsher on staining - had it at a 3.5. A 6.0 is insane to me. 

Hell if that's a 6.0 both of the round 3 books should be 9.8s. 

[obiedagod]

@thirdgreenham Unless I read the chart wrong, I think I may be listed wrong. It shows that I got a direct hit on book four, but I believe I submitted a 4.5 when it was a 4.0.

[thirdgreenham]

Just now, obiedagod said:

@thirdgreenham Unless I read the chart wrong, I think I may be listed wrong. It shows that I got a direct hit on book four, but I believe I submitted a 4.5 when it was a 4.0.

@sckao will look into this.

[kav]

4 hours ago, thirdgreenham said:

4 hours ago, obiedagod said:

@thirdgreenham Unless I read the chart wrong, I think I may be listed wrong. It shows that I got a direct hit on book four, but I believe I submitted a 4.5 when it was a 4.0.

@sckao will look into this.

I believe I submitted a 6.0 on the Wings there seems to be a glitch in messenger pls rectify thx.

[sckao]

4 hours ago, thirdgreenham said:

@sckao will look into this.

This one was real... We regret the error. (I had transposed the bullseye from ninanina who is directly above obiedagod in the spreadsheet and entered it twice for ninanina.... overwriting obiedagod's entry.

[sckao]

46 minutes ago, kav said:

I believe I submitted a 6.0 on the Wings there seems to be a glitch in messenger pls rectify thx.

We'll have to look into this..

[1950's war comics]

person_without_complete empathy guesses have been submitted...... 

[kav]

7 minutes ago, sckao said:

We'll have to look into this..

Finally someone listens.  This should really bump my score.  If you check the PM you'll clearly see it says 6.0.

[Hudson]

20 hours ago, Larryw7 said:

 

I thought 4.0 was being generous for the Wings.

I just wish that on the rare occasion when I send a book into CGC, that it would find its way to the desk of the visually impaired grader that apparently graded that Wings.

Or maybe the grader just forgot to look at the back of the book.

Edited September 25, 2019 by Hudson

[thirdgreenham]

2 minutes ago, Hudson said:

I just wish that on the rare occasion when I send a book into CGC, that it would find its way to the desk of the visually impaired grader that apparently graded that Wings.

Or maybe the grader just forgot to look at the back of the book.

Sore rump?  

[Hudson]

Just now, thirdgreenham said:

Sore rump?  

[Hudson]

In all seriousness, this is an AWESOME contest.

Sometimes the grades frustrate me and make me go like this....

I think that is part of the fun.  If we all agreed on every grade, then there would be no point to having this competition (or even having professional grading).

On the wings, I was going like this..... (Thinking 4.0 - 5.0).

I went with 4.0 and thus.....

JUST FOR THE RECORD - THIS CONTEST RULES AND I AM THANKFUL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE!