bennett02 Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 Galen130 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 Looks to have a little back cover creasing near the middle of the spine. Also the usual production flaws typical of this issue. 9.4 or better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timfinz Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 3 hours ago, grendelbo said: Looks to have a little back cover creasing near the middle of the spine. Also the usual production flaws typical of this issue. 9.4 or better. Agreed 9.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zegeroth Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 7.5. Back bottom tears and bottom left corner. BigLeagueCHEW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPH1964 Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 (edited) Agree with the production flaws, but pretty heavy spine crease or two… 9.2 Edited June 20, 2021 by MPH1964 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigLeagueCHEW Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 9.2 to 9.4 ish, front lower spine near the staple has a crease and blunt to the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroyT7986 Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 9.0 - 9.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timfinz Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 On 6/18/2021 at 11:54 PM, Zegeroth said: 7.5. Back bottom tears and bottom left corner. FYI: These are production bindery tears and do not effect the grade on this book right up to 9.8 bennett02 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zegeroth Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 8 hours ago, timfinz said: FYI: These are production bindery tears and do not effect the grade on this book right up to 9.8 Thanks, i stand corrected. However, the tear on the right in the tan area looks bigger than other books. Could there be additional tearing to the original production tear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timfinz Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 15 hours ago, Zegeroth said: Thanks, i stand corrected. However, the tear on the right in the tan area looks bigger than other books. Could there be additional tearing to the original production tear? I think the only person who could answer that question would be the original poster of the book. In my opinion it appears to be a bindery tear similar to the smaller, more frequently seen bindery tear to the left hand side of the book. OP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen130 Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 9.4-ish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpoolica Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 9.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Math Teacher Posted June 23, 2021 Share Posted June 23, 2021 9.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funnybooks Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 9.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
