• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Why Verification Of Sigs On Nonverifiable Books Is Such A Bad Idea
0

26 posts in this topic

Warning: To watch this 'experiment' watch between about 2:10 and ending around the 7 minute mark. The rest is garbage. 

So, anyone like to comment on the video? 

The Vid 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He bables too much.could be a fake to damage cbcs.said could.send the right one and just signe a wrong one and trash it,why am i saying that?because yellow verified label is because there was a certificate with it wich he did not talked about.no certificate is red label i know i own both so nuff said ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2021 at 7:01 PM, Namtak said:

He bables too much.could be a fake to damage cbcs.said could.send the right one and just signe a wrong one and trash it,why am i saying that?because yellow verified label is because there was a certificate with it wich he did not talked about.no certificate is red label i know i own both so nuff said ! 

Verified go on yellow too:

https://www.cbcscomics.com/verified-signature-program

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2021 at 8:03 PM, mattn792 said:

OK you are right so why red label?i send a zeck sig with certificate that i was present for and got it back yellow certified with certificate send back with.....that book stays in my collection anyway it was a gift but then why red label,im puzuled ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2021 at 7:14 PM, Namtak said:

OK you are right so why red label?i send a zeck sig with certificate that i was present for and got it back yellow certified with certificate send back with.....that book stays in my collection anyway it was a gift but then why red label,im puzuled ....

Verified used to go on red, but I think they switched to all yellow a couple years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2021 at 8:37 PM, alwaysbronze said:

it’s a good experiment and interesting result. his forged signature wasn’t even that good, it was missing a 2nd loop i think. i don’t own any cbcs yellow labels and now i will stay away from them.

Well witness yellow is a diferent thing,if there is no cgc witness i might take a cbcs witness whats the difference?i mean for sig and not grading,i prefer cgc grading but for a sketch or sig witness i might why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting vid. 

I have a few verified slabs. They were all books purchased from the Gene Colan and Dave Cockrum estates, so I have no reason to doubt their authenticity.

I worry more about fake Kirby and Ditko sigs because they're less common and more desirable.

And I'm sure there are plenty of fake Stan Lee sigs by Keya Morgan or his daughter or whichever grifter was around Stan at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 10:38 AM, MatterEaterLad said:

Interesting vid. 

I have a few verified slabs. They were all books purchased from the Gene Colan and Dave Cockrum estates, so I have no reason to doubt their authenticity.

I worry more about fake Kirby and Ditko sigs because they're less common and more desirable.

And I'm sure there are plenty of fake Stan Lee sigs by Keya Morgan or his daughter or whichever grifter was around Stan at the time.

Ditko has for a very, very long time refused to sign comic books. He wasn’t interested in the past and as follower of Ayn Rand's Objectivism philosophy, he see's no reason why he should do anything he doesn't want to do. He was known to respond to letters, which he signed.

Any comic book with Ditko's signature is almost certainly forged. He wouldn’t sign comics. Not for a charity, not for a friend, not for the kid with cancer or any other story you are told about the comic you found for sale. I wouldn't even fully trust VSP on Ditko's signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 12:24 PM, Terry JSA said:

Ditko has for a very, very long time refused to sign comic books. He wasn’t interested in the past and as follower of Ayn Rand's Objectivism philosophy, he see's no reason why he should do anything he doesn't want to do. He was known to respond to letters, which he signed.

Any comic book with Ditko's signature is almost certainly forged. He wouldn’t sign comics. Not for a charity, not for a friend, not for the kid with cancer or any other story you are told about the comic you found for sale. I wouldn't even fully trust VSP on Ditko's signature.

There are fairly dependable accounts that he signed some books at a handful of conventions in the late 60s and early 70s, and that he signed a small number of Mr. A books somewhat later than that. However, at this point, absent ironclad provenance, I can't imagine how any legitimate Ditko books could be distinguished from the comparatively plentiful forgeries.

As noted upthread, signature authentication is not a reliable science; indeed, it is neither of those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us not forget that former member 'Aliens' was both put in our HOS and action was taken by CBCS after he revealed that he had forged Ditko signatures on raw books here and had submitted Ditko signatures there to be verified and graded and sold. 

They would not say exactly what they did but they took action and hinted that he was banned from submitting any other books based on the information obtained by the serial numbers on the books he sold and the account associated with them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 4:05 PM, Buzzetta said:

Let us not forget that former member 'Aliens' was both put in our HOS and action was taken by CBCS after he revealed that he had forged Ditko signatures on raw books here and had submitted Ditko signatures there to be verified and graded and sold. 

They would not say exactly what they did but they took action and hinted that he was banned from submitting any other books based on the information obtained by the serial numbers on the books he sold and the account associated with them. 

Good news at least,man it is more terrifying than i thought,thank god i dont have more than one and another with one witnessed and verifyed but that one has an understandable story to it so....glad i dont have more wont try that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 1:49 PM, Qalyar said:

There are fairly dependable accounts that he signed some books at a handful of conventions in the late 60s and early 70s, and that he signed a small number of Mr. A books somewhat later than that. However, at this point, absent ironclad provenance, I can't imagine how any legitimate Ditko books could be distinguished from the comparatively plentiful forgeries.

As noted upthread, signature authentication is not a reliable science; indeed, it is neither of those things.

Yes, he did attend a few comic conventions but the only documented one seems to be NYCC back in 1964. While there are legit signatures out there like Mr. A and Ditko Package, it can be hard to differentiate a real signature from a fake one since he didn’t like signing things.

Edited by Terry JSA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unwitnessed sigs are pretty much useless absent the rare ironclad provenance.  "verifying" them is in my opinion a waste of money.  True signature experts give a percentage.  "I am 85% sure this is a real sig based on all the elements".  Absent this percentage on CBCS slabs and the credentials of whoever verified it you have in my opinion absolutely nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0