rubia514 Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 Galen130 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauce Dog Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 While I want to say it will be higher, as it presents very well, my gut is telling me this would grade around 3.5...but I would be happy to be wrong. Pressing won't do much for the technical grade, but would increase the eye appeal slightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Februus Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 I would say 2.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauce Dog Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 On 4/6/2022 at 10:30 PM, Februus said: I would say 2.5 I'm coming in high tonight it seems - this is sign that I should avoid buying raw books online tonight until I sleep on it and get back to my conservative grading self Februus and grendelbo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Februus Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 On 4/6/2022 at 7:32 PM, Sauce Dog said: I'm coming in high tonight it seems - this is sign that I should avoid buying raw books online tonight until I sleep on it and get back to my conservative grading self It wavers .. you might be really tight on the the next lower grade one.. I seem to struggle on the really high grade books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PINWHEEL Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 2.5 sounds about right to me. A press would make it look nicer but I don't know that it pumps the grade up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRoboto Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 I only say 3.5 because early 60s asm usually get the bumps. (2.5 if it wasn’t this book) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 2.5/3.0 Thanks for posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funnybooks Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 On 4/6/2022 at 11:18 PM, MrRoboto said: I only say 3.5 because early 60s asm usually get the bumps. (2.5 if it wasn’t this book) Ahh...the WWBN phenomenom @grendelbo On 4/6/2022 at 11:53 PM, grendelbo said: 2.5/3.0 Thanks for posting. 2.5 as is 3.0 cleaned up grendelbo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 On 4/7/2022 at 6:08 AM, Funnybooks said: Ahh...the WWBN phenomenom Funnybooks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comicginger1789 Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 2.5-3.0 from me. But like a great presenting copy in that range for sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief1332 Posted April 7, 2022 Share Posted April 7, 2022 I always like to see the book with the fc flipped open, in order to get a better sense of the spine condition. If spine is solid, 3.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen130 Posted April 8, 2022 Share Posted April 8, 2022 On 4/6/2022 at 9:53 PM, grendelbo said: 2.5/3.0 Thanks for posting. Agreed. grendelbo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
