PGM Wolverine #1 1988 1 1

[SolidShredder]

This copy looks super nice. Maybe 2 spine ticks. Crisp edges and corners. Unfortunately it's got some fingerprints that lift color and I'm not sure how much of a hit we're talking (upper right front cover and upper left back cover to a smaller extent). Please ignore the small spots on the bottom right of the back cover. Those are easily cleanable, so I'll be taking care of them. Thanks! 

 

 

[marvelmaniac]

Looks like a nice book, probably in the NM- 9.2 - NM 9.4 range with some color rub on the front and rear covers, however, the pic is blurry so it is difficult for me to see any small, minor defects.

[SolidShredder]

On 2/16/2023 at 11:48 AM, marvelmaniac said:

Looks like a nice book, probably in the NM- 9.2 - NM 9.4 range with some color rub on the front and rear covers, however, the pic is blurry so it is difficult for me to see any small, minor defects.

Woah, I thought for sure those fingerprints/color rub would hit the book way harder than that. That's why I wasn't too concerned with super detailed pictures. I thought it was a big enough defect to make tiny flaws irrelevant. I would be so happy if it could get around a 9.2, thus making the newsstand relevant. Here are a few more pictures. Thanks! 

[marvelmaniac]

I have old eyes and could not see them, looking at the other pics I do not see any structural defects, I only see color loss/rub along the edges and cover and the fingerprints in your close up pic.

I feel you are still in the VF/NM 9.0 range.

 

[Point Five]

With the color loss 8.5 is my guess; 8.0 doesn't seem out of the question. Probably not one I'd be in a hurry to submit.

 

[timfinz]

8.5

[grendelbo]

8.5

Thanks for posting.

[scburdet]

Yeah, 8.5