batman_fan Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 WD Comics and Stories Wait, what am I saying, I am a Batman collector! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWatson Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Batman #14. Am I the only one that thinks it's strange that the duck wears a shirt and a hat but no pants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Batman #14. Am I the only one that thinks it's strange that the duck wears a shirt and a hat but no pants? No, but you might be the only one who stares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWatson Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Batman #14. Am I the only one that thinks it's strange that the duck wears a shirt and a hat but no pants? No, but you might be the only one who stares. Blame it on the beer goggles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Batman #14. Am I the only one that thinks it's strange that the duck wears a shirt and a hat but no pants? No, but you might be the only one who stares. Blame it on the beer goggles. I hear you. Enough beer can make any old duck look like a swan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciorac Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 Both sold for $13,100 in 2006. Which one would you choose, and why ? WDCS #1! Can't pass on a key Duck book like that (thumbs u As usual, I agree with Ronaldo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1koko Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 As usual, I agree with Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MutantKeys Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 Both sold for $13,100 in 2006. Which one would you choose, and why ? WDCS #1! Can't pass on a key Duck book like that (thumbs u As usual, I agree with Ronaldo. (thumbs u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWatson Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. As usual, I agree with you. How about, "ouch"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWatson Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. As usual, I agree with you. How about, "ouch"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman_fan Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. the classics never get old, okay maybe a little old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. the classics never get old, okay maybe a little old You too? Maybe I do need to come up with something new.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socratic Wonder Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. the classics never get old, okay maybe a little old You too? Maybe I do need to come up with something new.... Wow Rich I never thought I would see the day you gave in so easy to a little peer presure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBedrock Posted October 10, 2007 Share Posted October 10, 2007 As usual, I agree with both books. As usual, you need a new line. the classics never get old, okay maybe a little old You too? Maybe I do need to come up with something new.... Wow Rich I never thought I would see the day you gave in so easy to a little peer presure I'm not giving in, just thinking up some new ways to say the same old thing. You know, keep it fresh. I still plan on taking both...as usual! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boba Posted October 12, 2007 Share Posted October 12, 2007 (edited) Can anyone confirm that George Tuska did the cover of Weird Comics 1 not Lou Fine? A fellow collector had George do a recreation of this cover and there was some question as to whether he (Tuska) did the original comic. Edited October 12, 2007 by Bob-a-loo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boba Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Thank you Jack (selegue) for sending the info regarding George Tuska's artwork on Weird Comics #1. I'm sure George will be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronty Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 how about neither of them? Yeesh, for 14k in value I'd much rather have other books. I love ducks but pre barks not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crowzilla Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 If Steve doesn't mind me hijacking his thread for a moment. The comparison of these two books this week in the ComicLink Auction has left me shaking my head. I can only imagine being set up at a convention just ten years ago and a guy bringing this first comic to me and offering a crisp $100 bill if I would trade it for the second. The times they are a'changin... So... Green Lantern #76 in 9.4 for $9,030 OR... Green Lantern #1 in 6.5 for $9,100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
