Batman #110

[Pezz5-migration]

What do you think of this Batman.

 

 

 

Thanks for any opinions

[Aces]

3.0

I was going 4.0/4.5 until the bottom part of the scan loaded...

[djpinkpanther67]

Welcome to the boards! 2.5 - 3.0

[Pezz5-migration]

Thanks DJ for the welcome, not so much the rating (just kidding).

[Shadow]

3.0 because the colors are still pretty good. But the chucks out of the cover hurt it.

[djpinkpanther67]

Thanks DJ for the welcome, not so much the rating (just kidding).

"walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...it's a duck"...scan grades are hardly accurate but I call it like I see it ...but it can be a NM in your heart

[Jeffro.]

3.0 sounds about right. Too bad about the missing pieces.

[Pezz5-migration]

I actually have a 115, 118, and 122 in a better condition cover wise (no chunks missing). Also have one with no cover unfortunately.

 

Thanks for the input

[Dad&Son-migration]

3.0

[agro23]

3.0 for sure. With the chunk out and what looks like a hole on the back cover. Also, it looks like some of that spine wear is actually rips through the whole book.

 

Cool comic though.

[Pezz5-migration]

No, just surface wear and a small tear on back of cover.

[agro23]

No, just surface wear and a small tear on back of cover.

Yeah, 'cause you don't see it on the back cover. The scan just pops out that wear though.

[Pezz5-migration]

Yeah, that's the problem with scanning dark colors. It just makes them look worse than in person. Maybe I'll post another batman so you can see the difference.

[burntboy]

have to agree on a 3.0ish...................

[Dr_Neff]

3.0 looks nice

 

I traded a 'Nam # 1 straight across for one of these when the Nam was hot in 1987 or whatever.

[rjpb]

2.5 - borderline 3.0