Ditko Spiderman page?

[comicartcom]

well it sure can't be Amazing Spiderman 35 as that is a Ditko issue that art is most certainly not Ditko

 

[Unca Ben]

this is the same fake page as before, yes?

[Unca Ben]

-another question: is this the only known Ditko fake? I don't mean recreations (I've got a couple) but items like this that seem meant to deceive (though not very well...)?

 

-Perhaps a list of known comic art forgeries, as a sticky in this forum, would be of service if allowed.

[dem1138]

Interesting that seller never describes it as Ditko art:

 

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 35 PAGE 14. PAGE SIZE ABOUT 20.5 X 13.5. IMAGE SIZE ABOUT 18.5 X 12.5. HAND DRAWN ART. $15 shipping and insurance. NO RETURNS.

 

[WYLDCHYLD]

And another $299.99 is spent for the Ditka page...here we go again kids...!

[WYLDCHYLD]

By the way...you'll notice the winning bidder's screen name featured the letters "J and O"...I wonder if he realizes exactly how "JO'd" he just got...

[westform]

Was it Pressed???????????

[JLA22fan-migration]

Reckon so. The color'ing is a dead giveaway

[westform]

Well then,... there you go.

[Spider-Variant]

Is $300 really that bad for a reproduction?

 

 

[comix4fun]

Is $300 really that bad for a reproduction?

 

 

 

 

Yes.

 

The blurryness, low light and small size of the scan should tell you something.

 

As a reproduction you could get a dozen guys to do this for $50-75 and it would look just as crappy. A perfect line for line light box could be done for $150.

 

C

[Spider-Variant]

Guess what's back?

 

 

ASM #35 DITKA REPRODUCTION

[AKA Rick]

The name Steve Ditko should not even be allowed within any part of the context of another artist's reproduction, especially if it's not a tribute piece but rather either lightboxed from the original or copied in some way which might confuse a potential customer or buyer into believing it is by Steve Ditko without reading the fine print, especially with a "Buy it Now" price of $1,599 that is around 10x less than what a real Ditko is worth (screaming "bargain opportunity") but in reality priced 100x more than what the piece probably is worth, if even at that from an investment standpoint. This ad screams of advertising with the intent to confuse, based primarily on the price, but in conjunction with the listing title and presentation of the artwork with description. I hope there's a money back guarantee if not satisfied.

[aqualad34]

I just offered the guy 5 dollars.

[TheWatcher]

Has that page been hanging out on "Jersey Shore", because it seems to have acquired a tan since the last time it was offered