• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

IS THIS A TRUE STATEMENT?

Started by THE_BEYONDER,

11 posts in this topic

Aces

Aces

Posted
Posted

There is wear at the top spine corner and I bet the same (if not worse) wear at the bottom spine corner (which you can't see).

Also a mark on the white spine a little below the top staple.

And a crease on the S (could be the case with a scratch).

 

I think wear made it a 9.0.

I don't think miswrap is considered when grading.

Unless it was so bad some of the writing on the cover was cut off.

Then it would get a Qualified grade no???

Link to comment
Share on other sites
THE_BEYONDER

THE_BEYONDER

Posted
  • Author
Posted
There is wear at the top spine corner and I bet the same (if not worse) wear at the bottom spine corner (which you can't see).

Also a mark on the white spine a little below the top staple.

And a crease on the S (could be the case with a scratch).

 

I think wear made it a 9.0.

I don't think miswrap is considered when grading.

Unless it was so bad some of the writing on the cover was cut off.

Then it would get a Qualified grade no???

 

Well, Steve said that a HULK 181 that they graded could have got a 9.8..... if not for the miswrap.

 

Just wondering if the seller believes that CGC downgrades for miswraps.....? 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

 

Did CGC downgrade this ASM 100 for the miswrap? confused-smiley-013.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DiceX

DiceX

Posted
Posted
They must have because that looks like a solid 9.2, maybe 9.4 to me(from what I can see).

 

I like my copy better. cool.gif

CGC 9.4 White

QP 9.8

sumo.gif

 

(I'm starting to like the QP thing, BY) grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing